Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E70) Forum
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2016, 12:30 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 54
macmac80210 is on a distinguished road
Bad Mileage 4.8i Sport Wheels. PSI Problem?

I just purchased a set of the 214 style 20" wheels for my 4.8i e70. Previously, I was averaging 15mpg in the city and 19mpg on the highway. I pressurized them to 37 rear, and 36 front, and am seeing a 5mpg reduction, so now average about 10mpg city and 14mpg highway.

Is pressure to blame for this huge reduction in mileage, or is it just the wheels? EPA spec with them is supposed to be 14/17, so I thought I would end up somewhere pretty close to there. I don't drive with a lead foot, and it's still pretty bad.

Can someone tell me what they usually inflate theirs to, and what your mileage with the 214 style sport rims usually averages?

Thanks a ton
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2016, 03:18 PM
bawareca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 976
bawareca is on a distinguished road
Judging what others get from their diesels, mine is loosing 2-3 mpg from the 214 wheels, so your results may be correct. I have mine inflated to 32F/34R when not towing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2016, 04:36 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 54
macmac80210 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawareca View Post
Judging what others get from their diesels, mine is loosing 2-3 mpg from the 214 wheels, so your results may be correct. I have mine inflated to 32F/34R when not towing.

That's really interesting. How does the tire wear come out with those readings? I've read stories of people only getting 14k miles with their 214's and I'm also hoping to avoid that.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2016, 08:25 PM
bawareca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 976
bawareca is on a distinguished road
Yeah, this is what i got from my rear Bridgestones with camber set at lowest possible and moderate towing. Now I have Nittos and after 7-8 k miles there is no visible wear at all.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2016, 12:24 AM
ard ard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sierra Foothills, California
Posts: 6,765
ard is on a distinguished road
wow. cannot understand how tires/wheels can have such a massive impact on MPG. BMW fights for 0.1mpg for CAFE standards...2-3mpg seems impossible.

Tire wear is driven (virtually) ENTIRELY by alignment....anyone concerned with tire life that does not know their TOE numbers is lost...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2016, 08:29 AM
bawareca's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 976
bawareca is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ard View Post
wow. cannot understand how tires/wheels can have such a massive impact on MPG. BMW fights for 0.1mpg for CAFE standards...2-3mpg seems impossible.
My results are not scientific, but I have seen people here report over 500 miles on a full tank. I was never able to get over 450 miles even with soft driving style. My mileage varies very little from city to hwy. Doing 80 on the hwy is where the roll resistance will have most impact so it makes sense.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ard View Post
Tire wear is driven (virtually) ENTIRELY by alignment....anyone concerned with tire life that does not know their TOE numbers is lost...
My rear Bridgestone RFT weared-out in a heartbeat with minimum camber settings possible(~1.2 degree) and 0 toe. Fronts were wearing on the outside first , which has nothing to do with the toe. You are generally correct, but with these monstrous sizes and run-flat tires the wear factors are different.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2016, 07:31 PM
youry's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 428
youry is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawareca View Post
My results are not scientific, but I have seen people here report over 500 miles on a full tank. I was never able to get over 450 miles even with soft driving style. My mileage varies very little from city to hwy. Doing 80 on the hwy is where the roll resistance will have most impact so it makes sense.
I get 500+ miles per tank(highway), 2012 X35i 56k, still running the original/factory Bridgestone RFT dueler tires (factory 18" wheels)
__________________
2012 X70 XDrive 35i
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-20-2016, 11:05 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 54
macmac80210 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by youry View Post
I get 500+ miles per tank(highway), 2012 X35i 56k, still running the original/factory Bridgestone RFT dueler tires (factory 18" wheels)


Tire size probably makes a huge difference, and you're also running a '12 3.5 and I'm running a '07 4.8.

I am now sitting right around 9.5 MPG after 2 tankfuls and a solid mixed-city commute. I have brand new Bridgestone tires, so I don't think that should be the issue. I have been trying to milk the mileage, but it's just not coming. I think the real issue is increased lb/ft of torque required at startup from 0mph because of the larger wheels. I was coming from a pair of 17" with a winter Bridgestone setup, and it's just frightening to see a 5+ MPG decrease with these things.

Any ideas on who to talk to about shitty mileage? Dealer or some tire place?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-20-2016, 11:08 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 54
macmac80210 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ard View Post
wow. cannot understand how tires/wheels can have such a massive impact on MPG. BMW fights for 0.1mpg for CAFE standards...2-3mpg seems impossible.

Tire wear is driven (virtually) ENTIRELY by alignment....anyone concerned with tire life that does not know their TOE numbers is lost...

I cannot understand it either. I think that I'll probably deflate them today, and see how my mileage is on a fresh tank. Right now, I'm running 5PSI over what some are suggesting, so that could be the issue, but I always was under the impression that higher was better for mileage. Maybe that's just old nonsense
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-20-2016, 12:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 37
Padgett114 is on a distinguished road
We went from 19's to 20's with offset on our 2010 35D and didn't really see much of a decrease in MPG, still get great mileage.
Attached Images
  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.