|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
2011 X5 Diesel
Am thinking of moving up from a 2004 X5 3.0 to possible 2011 X5 Diesel what is the thoughts on the BMW 35d and the Diesel X5 in General ? thank you Jim |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
You should really just do a search. There are tons of discussions on the 35d that you can learn from.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Basically, people who buy diesels generally like them.
They won't save you money vs a 35i, due to their lower reliability and extensive issues with carbon build up and emissions failures. Most diesel owners exaggerate their fuel economy results, they are real world about 10-20% better than the 35i. The 35i is faster and quieter and has more hp. The 35i is really the low cost option on an x5. Generally I'd say the diesel and the v8s are equally as expensive to maintain. There are lots of mods for all x5 engines, and most of the emissions problems can be fixed by modding, if you live in a non emissions checking area. I own a diesel, and like it. But it's had extensive problems with the emissions and after spending a lot to remove them, it's finally reliable for a BMW. Some people are lucky, but hey not every 48i has bad valve stem seals and a valley coolant leak right? With that said, I never bought another diesel after this one, thought about one for my x5, but opted for a gasoline v8 which has been more reliable than my diesel. Both 48i and x5m have had fewer engine issues than my 335d. But I love my 335d and drive it frequently Last edited by Thecastle; 05-21-2017 at 10:18 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
2011 X5 Diesel
Hi everyone,
First post here, I have had my 2009 x5 35d for 2 years now, previously had a 4.8i, was a nice car to drive, but the diesel has the m sport pack and feels like a much chassis. Fuel consumption is good, 38mpg cruising on a flat road (actually, no exaggeration) but city driving 20mpg roughly and a heavy foot will still use a lot of fuel. If I remember correctly The N57 diesel engine was released in 2010, there may be some issues there, search around. Also depending on your budget and if you want more power, I believe the 40d was out in 2011 and the M50d in 2012. They could go by a different name in the U.S. Last edited by BevMW; 05-22-2017 at 09:08 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I had a 2012 CPO X5D. After 3 months of ownership and 900 trips to BMW it finally decided to put itself out of its own misery and caught fire. It was a blast to drive when it ran properly.
__________________
2010 X5 3.0 X-drive Titanium Silver/Black 2018 Ford F-150 Platinum Crew 2010 528xi (His) 2017 M2 Manual (His) Former Headaches: 2008 X5 RIP 2015 M235 2013 135is 2009 535xi Wagon (JUNK) ![]() 2007 530xi 6spd CPO Sport (Best Damn Car EVER) 2011 335xi M-sport Coupe 6spd (Sex on Wheels) 2010 550GT "CPO" (Junk) ![]() 2012 X5 35d "CPO" (More Junk) ![]() 2004 330i ZHP Sedan 2002 325xi Wagon 2000 323i Sedan 1998 M3 Sedan 1992 325i Sedan |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Seriously though in the 1st year of ownership (I bought it used and under warranty), I only had it out of the shop for maybe 12 weeks. I want through CBU, multiple EGR (5x) valves, (4x) EGR coolers, 2x diff pressure sensors, 4x nox sensors, 5x exhaust pressure sensors, vacuum hoses, 5x MAF sensors, SCR catlyst, DEF tank, DPF, haha, in less than 45K miles. Now it needs a vibration damper, just replaced the battery, diff whine. But it is my unicorn (e90 diesel) and in spite of its total lack of emissions reliability I still like it. But that is why I went GAS for my next vehicles. Now I've spent several thousand tuning and removing the emissions equipment. P.S. most of these reliability issues were never solved by the factor other than extreme CBU. DEF tanks are a 50K service item typically. That is why I say you wont save money on a diesel compared to the 35.i |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
maybe it's just me but it seems there is possibly more pain and suffering to be had as a first owner who steps into the unknown with a low mileage car. where as someone who buys a car with say 150k miles and in good condition is buying a tried and tested vehicle that already had a lot of the kinks worked out by some poor soul who had to put in all the time and effort taking it into the dealer.
ultimately maybe it's not the v6 gas or the Diesel or the V8 that one has to worry about but whether that car has had a service history of nothing but problems. |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|