Quote:
Originally Posted by kaput
That is absolutely insane. I owned a 2002 M3 with the S54 engine. I didn't put $3K into it in over 7 years. My subframe was fine, VANOS held up. I replaced my SMG pump with a used one (only the motor failed) and did oil changes and tires. I guess with tires, it may have been over $3K, but not by much.
I don't understand how anyone, unless money doesn't matter to them would even remotely recommend that engine to anyone just because torque and horsepower. Like really, $3K in two years? On just engine repair? Wow.
I replaced my M3 with a 35i, 2012 X5. I don't need mad horsepower and torque. It passes things just fine. I get better milage, cheaper maintenance, and its got plenty of grunt for day to day driving.
Up to you really. I've owned BMW V8s before, and everything was twice as expensive, even the little things. I decided to stick with the I6, and enjoy a bit of silent, smooth operation.
|
If you have to pay a few thousand a year to keep a V8 X5 running, that makes absolute financial sense. I paid less than a quarter of new price for my V8 X5, and can easily justify the high maintenance costs, given the fact that I'm not paying $800 a month to lease a new one. Granted, there are lot's of things that would never go wrong on a Toyota V8, but the X5 is no Tacoma.
12-14-2017, 12:54 PM
Threaded Mode
