E70 0-100km Performance

[Dubai_86]

0-100km, 6.5s is a lie!
it's more like 7.7s/8s =/
now that's disappointing!

[NOVAX5]

i wouldn't care less about this on an suv. this is an suv/family/soccermom/mover vehicle, not a race car. a lot of people really do care about this kinda stuff. but its pointless. would you ever want to line up next to an souped up civic and race? man, i tell you those civic are crazy fast once they are properly modded. but if you take your m3 to the heat, thats when these number count. just forge about it. you never race anyone from 0-60 mph in this suv. thats just my opinion.

[Dubai_86]

Originally Posted by NOVAX5

i wouldn't care less about this on an suv. this is an suv/family/soccermom/mover vehicle, not a race car. a lot of people really do care about this kinda stuff. but its pointless. would you ever want to line up next to an souped up civic and race? man, i tell you those civic are crazy fast once they are properly modded. but if you take your m3 to the heat, thats when these number count. just forge about it. you never race anyone from 0-60 mph in this suv. thats just my opinion.

I know what you mean believe me, but it's just pathatic to see a range rover beat an E70, plus, if BMW declared that the 4.8 can do 0-100 in just 6.5 secs then it JUST should! =/

[bmw_uae]

Originally Posted by Dubai_86

I know what you mean believe me, but it's just pathatic to see a range rover beat an E70, plus, if BMW declared that the 4.8 can do 0-100 in just 6.5 secs then it JUST should! =/

i dont know

whats wrong with your x5... i raced my brother with his range

vogue supercharged and my friends rr sport supercharge and the x5 was

in front for about 2 car lengths ... maybe you didnt know how to start it ,

try evryway and see how you can race with a better start ,, and i tired 0-100 km 3 times only but the best i took out of the x5 was 6.9 and the

best i could in a range rover was 8.somthng .... next time im trying with a

4.8is too see the difference ... if you couldnt do better than 8 sec i think ther is something wrong with your car ... plus the more you drive it the better car perfomance u will have ...

[Dubai_86]

Originally Posted by bmw_uae

i dont know

whats wrong with your x5... i raced my brother with his range

vogue supercharged and my friends rr sport supercharge and the x5 was

in front for about 2 car lengths ... maybe you didnt know how to start it ,

try evryway and see how you can race with a better start ,, and i tired 0-100 km 3 times only but the best i took out of the x5 was 6.9 and the

best i could in a range rover was 8.somthng .... next time im trying with a

4.8is too see the difference ... if you couldnt do better than 8 sec i think ther is something wrong with your car ... plus the more you drive it the better car perfomance u will have ...

ahh alright

well maybe i'm just a bad driver loool
but i got pissed off when the range rover vogue passed me!
ow yeah, i know this might sound dumb but is there a way to actually help the car move fast from 0-100? lol

[bmw_uae]

Originally Posted by Dubai_86

ahh alright

well maybe i'm just a bad driver loool
but i got pissed off when the range rover vogue passed me!
ow yeah, i know this might sound dumb but is there a way to actually help the car move fast from 0-100? lol

ill check whats the best way ,

but when i raced , the gear i left it in sport , kept my left foot on the brake and the right foot on full throttle, kept the rpm at the highest.. and let go off the brake , it will have a good start ... i also hear that they have an exhaust system that really helps the car ... ill check on that

[MD11F]

Originally Posted by Dubai_86

0-100km, 6.5s is a lie!
it's more like 7.7s/8s =/
now that's disappointing!

this video seems to show differently.. sorry, maybe you need to have your vehicle checked.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRB1D6OzNP4&NR=1

[scoobydoo]

Originally Posted by MD11F

this video seems to show differently.. sorry, maybe you need to have your vehicle checked.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRB1D6OzNP4&NR=1

wellover7seconds

sorryspacebardoesntwork

[MD11F]

Originally Posted by scoobydoo

wellover7seconds

sorryspacebardoesntwork

none sense.. He started to accelerate in the 7th second (we'll say 7.5), and he hit 100kph right at the 14th.. that is less than 7, and likely close to the 6.5 claimed.

This car has been tested by numerous sources/publications, and none have come to the conclusion some here have.

[scoobydoo]

Originally Posted by MD11F

none sense.. He started to accelerate in the 7th second (we'll say 7.5), and he hit 100kph right at the 14th.. that is less than 7, and likely close to the 6.5 claimed.

This car has been tested by numerous sources/publications, and none have come to the conclusion some here have.

I_timed_it_3_times_every_time_it_was_over_7.Seen_a _dozen_reviews_no_car-
mag_got_it_to_62_under_7_seconds!BMW_lied