|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seeing 93 being 3cents more than 91 last time, I decided to give it a whirl. I feel no difference at all in performance or fuel efficiency. I'll be going back to 91...
__________________
'08 X5 3.0si - Alpine White / Saddle Brown interior Specs: Sport Pkg, Premium Pkg, Tech Pkg, Comfort Access, Aero Kit, Style 433 staggered 20s on Conti DWS Mods: Carbon 35 tint, LED angel eyes, GP Thunder 7500k fogs, H&R 20mm/25mm spacers, clear reflectors, gunsmoke-tinted taillights Coded: Digital speedo, windows/sunroof/tailgate close via keyfob X5 pics at Flickr |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
in germany bmw explicitly recommends 95oct and higher. but it just doesnt matter cause there is no difference in the price with '91
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why do people think higher octane = more power?
In the East Coast, 93 is pretty much the standard rating for premium. In some cases, 91 is available. There's a 7-11 in Richmond that has 5 grades of petrol. I pay for the 91, which is mildly cheaper than 93, and as far as I can tell, has no downside. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Actually, why'm I commenting in this thread? This subject "is so done..."
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please no more discussion!!
Lock this thread!!!!
__________________
T |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|