Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > BMW SAV Forums > X5 (E70) Forum
Fluid Motor Union
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2012, 09:48 AM
rh71's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: LI | NY
Posts: 3,924
rh71 is on a distinguished road
rotors question

We've all heard about BMW not doing pads & rotors together anymore under maintenance. If your pads are low, they will do them, but it's tough getting them to do rotors. I had both my pads done (separate visits) but because my warranty/maintenance are about to run out, I wanted to see how close to minimum spec the rotors were so I had them measure. The statement is:

Front rotor minimum spec is 28.4MM when replacing pads but 26.0MM when not replacing pads. Rear rotor minimum spec is 18.4MM.

My measurements after 4 years: front 28.2MM and rear 19.1MM.

My first question is why would rear minimum specs be different from fronts? I know they definitely seem to wear faster (as do the rear pads). My SA also said that I shouldn't worry about the rotors unless I start feeling they're warped (brake vibration, etc.). Hard to believe - what exactly should I be looking out for, because I won't be doing pads for another 3-4 years at this rate (25k miles in 4 years)? Surprising too, with my 80% local driving. What are the measurements of brand new rotors anyway?
__________________
'08 X5 3.0si - Alpine White / Saddle Brown interior
Specs: Sport Pkg, Premium Pkg, Tech Pkg, Comfort Access, Aero Kit, Style 433 staggered 20s on Conti DWS
Mods: Carbon 35 tint, LED angel eyes, GP Thunder 7500k fogs, H&R 20mm/25mm spacers, clear reflectors, gunsmoke-tinted taillights
Coded: Digital speedo, windows/sunroof/tailgate close via keyfob

X5 pics at Flickr
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 01-11-2012, 10:27 AM
BGM's Avatar
BGM BGM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,830
BGM is on a distinguished road
I just had both my fronts rotors/pads done. He said they always do both. Maybe try another dealer.
__________________
2008 X5 4.8
Jet Black/Black Nevada/Dark Burl Walnut
Adaptive Drive
Premium Pack
Tech Pack
Climate Pack
Sport Pack
20" Wheel Option
Premium Sound
Sirius Satellite
Rear DVD Entertainment
Multi-Contour Seats
Comfort Access
3rd Row Seat
Heated Front Seats
Running Boards
3M VentureShield Paint Protection Film
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2012, 05:07 PM
JCL's Avatar
JCL JCL is offline
Premier Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 11,853
JCL will become famous soon enoughJCL will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by rh71 View Post
Front rotor minimum spec is 28.4MM when replacing pads but 26.0MM when not replacing pads. Rear rotor minimum spec is 18.4MM.

My measurements after 4 years: front 28.2MM and rear 19.1MM.

My first question is why would rear minimum specs be different from fronts? I know they definitely seem to wear faster (as do the rear pads). My SA also said that I shouldn't worry about the rotors unless I start feeling they're warped (brake vibration, etc.). Hard to believe - what exactly should I be looking out for, because I won't be doing pads for another 3-4 years at this rate (25k miles in 4 years)? Surprising too, with my 80% local driving. What are the measurements of brand new rotors anyway?
Front brakes do 70% of the stopping, so they are built heavier to start. More mass means that they can take more hard stops before getting too hot. In general, front brakes will wear faster from stopping. Brakes are also used for traction control, so faster wear on the rears can be related to the traction control intervening more often (given the rear wheel bias of power delivery).

As rotors get thinner, they will fade faster. You may not ever notice it, if you don't get them hot enough to fade.
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White

Retired:
2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey
2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver

2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey
2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2012, 05:23 PM
rh71's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: LI | NY
Posts: 3,924
rh71 is on a distinguished road
^ so the only concern I'd have with rotors is less stopping power over time? No "catastrophic failure" scenario to worry about as they wear thinner?
__________________
'08 X5 3.0si - Alpine White / Saddle Brown interior
Specs: Sport Pkg, Premium Pkg, Tech Pkg, Comfort Access, Aero Kit, Style 433 staggered 20s on Conti DWS
Mods: Carbon 35 tint, LED angel eyes, GP Thunder 7500k fogs, H&R 20mm/25mm spacers, clear reflectors, gunsmoke-tinted taillights
Coded: Digital speedo, windows/sunroof/tailgate close via keyfob

X5 pics at Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2012, 11:57 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Renton WA
Posts: 42
scollins is on a distinguished road
The rear rotors are thinner to begin with than the front rotor, so they'll have a lower "minimum width" spec no matter what.

Factory fronts discs vary in size depending on model according to one website. My 35d has 348x30 fronts and 320x20 rears. Your '08 likely has 332x30 front and 320x20 rears.
__________________
Scott
On Order: 2015 F15 X5 35i
Space Gray with Mocha Nappa Interior Design Pkg and fineline Oak trim
ZXD | ZCW | ZPP | 3AG | 456 | 4UB | 4U1 | 5DL | 688
To be Traded: 2010 E70 X5 35d
Alpine White on Black with Dark Bamboo trim
ZAP | ZCW | ZPP | ZPS | ZRC | ZTP | 322 | 328 | 330 | 386 | 4AZ | 4UB | 655 | 6FL | 6NF
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2012, 01:25 AM
ard ard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sierra Foothills, California
Posts: 6,730
ard is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by rh71 View Post
The statement is:

Front rotor minimum spec is 28.4MM when replacing pads but 26.0MM when not replacing pads. Rear rotor minimum spec is 18.4MM.

My measurements after 4 years: front 28.2MM and rear 19.1MM.

My first question is why would rear minimum specs be different from fronts? I know they definitely seem to wear faster (as do the rear pads). My SA also said that I shouldn't worry about the rotors unless I start feeling they're warped (brake vibration, etc.). Hard to believe - what exactly should I be looking out for, because I won't be doing pads for another 3-4 years at this rate (25k miles in 4 years)? Surprising too, with my 80% local driving. What are the measurements of brand new rotors anyway?
Subscribed
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2012, 02:26 AM
JCL's Avatar
JCL JCL is offline
Premier Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 11,853
JCL will become famous soon enoughJCL will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by rh71 View Post
^ so the only concern I'd have with rotors is less stopping power over time? No "catastrophic failure" scenario to worry about as they wear thinner?

Not less stopping power. Each stop will be as good as with new rotors, until they get too hot and fade. Rotors act as a heat sink. When they have less mass (thinner), they will overheat sooner, because brakes produce more heat than they can radiate, and you will reach that point where they are overheated (and fade occurs).

Catastrophic failure is not likely until they are so thin that they are weakened structurally. It can happen, but that is an extreme. And they don't all fail at once.
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White

Retired:
2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey
2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver

2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey
2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-12-2012, 03:52 PM
ard ard is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sierra Foothills, California
Posts: 6,730
ard is on a distinguished road
Can anyone comment on the apparent fact that the SA is quoting two 'wear limits' based on where on not pads are being replaced? JCL, you'd know this....

In my experience the limit is the limit, and a 32mm rotor has a wear limit of 30.4; a 30mm has a limit of 28.4...

I'd NEVER run a rotor under the limit. Ever.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-12-2012, 07:26 PM
rayxi's Avatar
Custom User Title
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 4,173
rayxi is on a distinguished road
I suspect the two limits are for different purposes. The lower limit is the absolute safe limit. The higher limit is to do with "wastage" of useable rotor.
__________________
Wake up every day that would be a start.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-12-2012, 10:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MD
Posts: 74
nachilus is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ard View Post
Can anyone comment on the apparent fact that the SA is quoting two 'wear limits' based on where on not pads are being replaced? JCL, you'd know this....

In my experience the limit is the limit, and a 32mm rotor has a wear limit of 30.4; a 30mm has a limit of 28.4...

I'd NEVER run a rotor under the limit. Ever.
I checked with my SA, and I spook with some of the mechanics.

I was told, if the rotors are very close or past the wear limit they recommend change. If the rotors are in an area where it will last with the expected life of the new brakes they just replace the pads only.
__________________
2007 X5 4.8 |Space Grey | Sport Package | Cold Weather Package | Premium Sound Package | Active Steering | Rear seat entertainment | Premium Package | Rear Climate Package | Technology Package | Comfort Access | Multi-contour seats w/lumbar | 3rd row seat | iPod and USB adapter | Running boards | Wheels Arches | 214, 20" Wheels |

05' Mercedes S55 ///AMG
05' 745 IL (Sold)
01' 740 IL (Sold)
04' Yukon Denali
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.