|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]() both are very nice cars mmmkay...? |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() NOVA - you have no credibility without driving all the SUV's you're referring to, sorry. But thanks for that unbiased ranking of SUV's - I'll look for your article in Automobile soon.
__________________
Go 50i or go home
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
who cares. the cayenne is butt ass fugly. i'd drive a 4 cylinder x5 over an fugly car any day......
__________________
2007 X5 4.8 2006 IS350 04 R1 01 VFR800 00 SV650 |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
I personally think you have to go with the GTS or higher as far as the Cayenne goes. The base model and the S are just flat out ugly, IMO. I feel the same with MB. Except for the ML 63, none of the ML's do anything for me. The X5 is far better looking and would be more fun to drive compared to the equivalent Porsce or MB, IMO. Unfortunately, the 4.8i is a little underpowered when you get into the realm of the ML 63 and higher end peppers. I guess it will be different when the M versions of the X5 comes out, not to mention the X6. I would bet the playing field will be somewhat leveled then.
Also, Audi doesn't make anything that really competes with the X5 right now and far as looks and driving dynamics are concerned. Infinity is even further down the list. They are a second tier manufacturer compared to BMW, Porsche and MB, IMO. I don't care how fast the FX is. Last edited by FSETH; 02-26-2009 at 05:41 PM. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
the cherokee srt8 was pretty damn fast suv, but who cares??
__________________
2007 X5 4.8 2006 IS350 04 R1 01 VFR800 00 SV650 |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
zactly...
__________________
Christiaan.... 2008 4.8i
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cayenne GTS vs. X5 4.8
Exterior BMW Interior BMW Space Cayenne Power Cayenne Top speed Cayenne Road driving BMW Off-road Cayenne Brakes Cayenne Packages BMW Reliability Cayenne (2008 onwards) Price BMW If I could choose between the two, I would pick Cayenne GTS. So far im satisfied with x5 4.8. |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Cargo E70 BMW X5 has 75 cubic feet of cargo capacity Cayenne has 62.5 cubic feet of cargo capacity Seating E70 BMW X5 has 60" of front shoulder room Cayenne has 58.5" The pepper may have been bigger than the E53 variant, but not currently. IMO, power & top speed are basically measuring the same thing (or mfg's limiters). Given that, BMW wins 6 of 10 criteria. BMW still wins - price dependent. ![]() p.s. What about Safety as a criteria? BMW=winner?
__________________
Go 50i or go home
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even this is a BMW X5 forum and I am a BMW fan, I would still go with the Cayenne GTS. Sometimes we have to accept reality that X5 is not any superior to SUVs in the same league. E70 or W164, W164 all the way.
__________________
2002 X5 3.0 Siena Red Premium, Cold Weather, Rear Climate Packages, 19" Wheels Aluminum Running Boards, Clear Tail Lights, Clear Side Markers Titanium Kidney Grills, Titanium Trunk Lid, Xenon Headlights 4.6is X5 exhausts, 35% Tint, Aluminum Pedals 2005 530I Mystic Blue Premium Package, Sport Package, Xenon Headlights 18" Sport Wheels, 35% Tint all around Mods to come: M-Tech Front Bumper, M5 Side Skirts, M5 Rear Bumper Quad Exhausts, Style 172 19" Wheels |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|