|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
'08 X5 3.0si - Alpine White / Saddle Brown interior Specs: Sport Pkg, Premium Pkg, Tech Pkg, Comfort Access, Aero Kit, Style 433 staggered 20s on Conti DWS Mods: Carbon 35 tint, LED angel eyes, GP Thunder 7500k fogs, H&R 20mm/25mm spacers, clear reflectors, gunsmoke-tinted taillights Coded: Digital speedo, windows/sunroof/tailgate close via keyfob X5 pics at Flickr |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Or it was a chick driver who uses two feet! |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Also, front brakes went 13,800 the first time, then 13,500 the second time. Rear brakes went 19,800. Sounds like the original owner did keep one foot on the brake pedal all the time, whether or not he was a chick.
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds average to me. Nothing serious on the history.
I did see a noise complaint on the brakes. Anyway, it doesn't matter if brakes were used up in 5k miles or 50k miles. It's a wear item. The part eluding to the tranny being overworked becuase of the short pad life is not a huge concern in my book. It just means the car was driven and not babied. Agressively driven, sure; abused, probably not. If you get it for the right price and you like the car, I would go for it. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
On my service history, The brakes were replaced at 13,500 miles. It all depends on the driving style. Some people ride the brakes while going 60mph on the highway.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|