| Eric5273 |
12-27-2007 07:17 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by diogenes!
Our government can't even keep simple secrets, like dunking a couple of unlawful combatants, much less a palace coup...
|
Who said anything about keeping secrets? You are correct....they are terrible at keeping secrets. There is tons of leaks and tons of information that has been released by the government over the years on many of the assassinations.
During the 1990s, under the 1992 "JFK Act" which George Bush Sr. signed into law, over 4 million government documents were released by the Congressional Assassination Records Review Board. More than 90% of these documents pre-dated the assassination, yet were deemed worthy of being related to the assassination. That's a lot of documents having to do with something which you say was a random shooting by a lone nut.
The Assassination Records Review Board also subpeonaed any witnesses who were still alive and re-interviewed them. All these interviews are public record.
The most interesting testimony given was that of the autopsy doctors. Here is the transcripts of those:
ARRB Medical Testimony
Quote:
Because of the highly controversial and conflicted medical testimony in the JFK assassination, and the lack of a chain-of-custody for so many important evidentiary materials, the ARRB decided to conduct sworn depositions to "clarify the medical evidence."
In 1996 through 1998, testimony was taken from nine persons present at Kennedy's autopsy, two others who were involved in processing or disseminating photographs of the autopsy, and five doctors who treated JFK in Parkland Hospital in Dallas. For those familiar with the medical evidence in the case, these detailed interviews contain a wealth of material and have fueled the debate over the nature of Kennedy's wounds and the direction of shots which caused them.
Some of the testimony directly impugns the very authenticity of autopsy materials. For instance, the ARRB interviewed Saundra Kay Spencer, who processed autopsy photographs the weekend of the assassination, and testified that the photos now in the National Archives are not the ones she developed. Similarly autopsy photographer John Stringer disavowed the photos of the brain held in the Archives. These depositions are "must reading" for those with an interest in the medical aspects of the case.
|
Just a FYI: all nine doctors who were interviewed regarding the autopsy -- ALL of them said that the photographs currently in the National Archives (the same ones published in the Warren Commission report and later used by the House Select Committee in the 1970s) are NOT photographs of the body that they examined. They all described a big hole in the rear of the head, i.e. part of the rear skull missing -- yet the photos all show a tiny bullet-size hole in the rear of the head with the rest of the skull intact.
In any case, the autopsy is just one of about 20 different areas you can study on the assassination, and in all of the areas, the Warren Commission's evidence falls apart as either being lies or being based on phony evidence. There is not even a tiny bit of their evidence that stands up to scrutiny.
None of this evidence is hidden or being kept a secret. It is just ignorant people who still think the world is flat 15 years after it has been proven to be round. Yes, a round world is a hard concept to grasp for those who are used to living in a flat world. But it is no "conspiracy theory" anymore. It has been proven 10 times over and is now fact. |
