Originally Posted by Meiac09

Whats the difference between a drunk driver and a stoned driver?
The drunk driver runs the stop sign, the blazed one waits for it to turn green.

Originally Posted by B-Line

Oh yeah, I forgot,

The money that's spent on law enforcement, prosecution, incarcerating marijuana offenders can be used to solve millions of other problems.

As for the pot head, on the road, driving argument, that's just a silly argument. Driving Under the Influence is Driving Under the Influence. Doesn't matter if it's alcohol, weed, meth, prescrition drugs like oxycodone, perckaset, xanax, etc.

Besides, given the choice, of being in a car accident, where the person that hits me is:
a) drunk
b) on Meth
c) on Coke
d) on prescription pills
e) smoked a joint

I'll take "E" as the lesser of all evils, everyday of the week and twice and sunday. yes, it will be annoying to have to replace the bumper, but it's a much better alternative than being rammed by some drunk lady in a Ford F-350 Dually.

I'm not suggesting in reality that one is really better than the other, I am kidding. but really, there are laws in place, DUI does not mean, driving
DRUNK, it means, driving under the INFLUENCE of any substance.

Originally Posted by B-Line

Why would they have to ban it's use anymore than the way they restrict the current use of Alcohol and Tobacco?

If you can't walk the street with an open container, you shouldn't be able to smoke a joint. But if there is an outdoor bar, and the bar owner allows it, and is in a smoking section, how is it any different than how alcohol is controlled and regulated?

Originally Posted by trueX5er

some would consider it worse.

Originally Posted by Meiac09

expain how it is worse. At least weed smoke doesn't have a ton of chemical additives in it. :tsk: