Originally Posted by motordavid

I must be sleeping during the lecture or, really getting older...

I don't get DrDrex's point, or some of the other "points", here.

Some wacko/jokester/idiot/dogooder/whatever, puts up a
"We Support Obama" thank you note, "signed" by a murderous
jihad group, it gets taken down, and everyone thinks of the
grassy knoll. And, the suggestion is, Obama was really supported
by this group of gutless murderers, it was taken down to protect
Obama or his supporters, and thus, we "see" the power of the
Edit/Delete function vis a vis the internet, and/or we should all
really consider Obama as a threat to the US, etc.

These mile-wide, innuendo driven leaps, are pretty remarkable, imo.

What the hell am I missing here?

Originally Posted by Quicksilver

You didn't miss a thing. That was exactly the point.
However if the original point makes no sense one
can always change the subject right? ..... :rofl:

Originally Posted by trueX5er

This is creepy.

Can we have a democratic style election where we vote on whether the administrators on this website are fit for the job?