Hmmmm I was looking at a 52inch screen.
Is there that much difference between the 2?

6"


:nanana:

:rolleyes: First, he refuses to help a fellow, seasoned, well respected board member get out of an extortionate lease agreement, and now this! Geez...:rofl:

Who wouldn't want an additional 6 inches??? :D

QS: Aside from the obvious difference, it's about $600 more for the 52". Other than that, from what I have read they are identical in terms of performance. I would prefer the 52" but for that kind of savings I think the 46" will be just fine. The 46" can eventually become a bedroom TV. :thumbup:

i'm such an asshat... i should be banned ;)

You and i are on the same wave length and i believe that what's gonna happen. The 46 inch will reside in the family room until i get the 52 or something better to replace it.

Now i gotta figure out what to do with this Sharp 36 inch monster that just won't die...........:dunno:

Lord knows i have no desire to haul that thing upstairs....:rolleyes:

I love you too Buzzard bait...... :nanana: :rofl: :rofl:

47" Philips 1080p for $869 with coupon code.

coupon code 129380 for an additional 10% off

$1 shipping for today.

FWIW, the latest issue of Consumer Reports has the Aquos models at the very BOTTOM of the LCD ratings in the 52" and 46" categories. The Samsung LN models and the Sony Bravias are the leaders of the LCD segment for those sizes. According to the ratings, the Sharp is getting dragged down for DVD-picture quality and Standard-Def picture quality.

Don't shoot the messenger.....:dunno:

^^ Samsung may look good initially but is bad for brand reliability...even Vizio is more reliable than Samsung....enjoy till it breaks down as once it breaks they will send you a refurbished unit, not new....been there done that on more than one Samsung product. :tsk:

Amazingly Sanyo is on top for CR reliability list followed by Sony, Sylvania, Panasonic, JVC, Sharp, Toshiba, Vizio, Samsung, Philips etc...