![]() |
Quote:
The taxpayers would end up paying the bill anyway because of the FDIC, which would end up having to reimburse all the lost deposits. As I posted in another thread, the only solution for the banking industry is nationalization. Personally, I am against any kind of "bailout". If the government wants to use my tax money to purchase companies, then fine. But just to give my tax money away to these private companies -- that I am surely against. |
:iagree: with Eric. History repeats itself.
|
GM seeks $16.6 billion, to lay-off 47k emoloyees
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29243150/ |
WHAT a surprise! I would have never saw that coming! How the F--K does the CFO of this company still have his job?
ONLY $16 billion this month? I'm absolutely CERTAIN they won't need another dime after that so oh heck, let's give it to them just because they asked nicely and drove their hybrids to the Capital and fed the parking meters this time. |
I've not read these yet but I'm going to predict that the proposed restructuring includes cuts that are too shallow and occur over too long a period of time and are far to dependent on unqualified government guarantees. I'll have a chance to read them later today, I'm hopeful but not optimistic.
Copy of the GM Restructuring Plan http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/...turingPlan.pdf Copy of the Chrysler Restructuring Plan - Summary http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/...lanSummary.pdf Copy of the Chrysler Restructuring Plan http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/...turingPlan.pdf |
1 Attachment(s)
Fits the situation well.
|
Well, Saab is the first to file. Funny that GM asked the Sweedish gov't for bailout money as well.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,497250,00.html |
Quote:
|
Unions do indeed waste lots of productivity. Did you ever pass by some road work being done? There's usually a bunch of guys sitting around while a couple of guys work. That's because union regulations require that a certain amount of workers be on each job, even when it is totally unnecessary. I would guess the UAW regulations are not much different.
The truth is that without the unions, a lot of people would be out of a job because so many workers simply would not be needed. Unemployment would go way up. We simply no longer have the need for 100% employment. With technology and other advances, we can produce all the goods and services everyone needs with far less than 100% employment. We just have to decide whether we will do an across the board cut of hours and perhaps have full employment with a 30 hour work week, or if we are instead prepared to accept 10-20% unemployment. I suppose this is a good problem to have. We have become more productive and don't need to work as much anymore. Any society would surely consider that to be an achievement, not a problem. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 PM. |
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.