Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-08-2006, 02:27 PM
Eric5273's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 4,460
Eric5273 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradATL
Exactly how would they "squash" it?
They influence government policy through very powerful lobbying.

It is well known that most of the R&D in the energy industry comes from government funding and tax credits, and that also applies to the oil industry that for decades did not have to pay any corporate income taxes due to the oil depreciation allowance. Today they still get large tax credits for any money they spend on R&D -- at a time when they are showing record profits.

And at the same time, the government has refused to provide similar tax credits for companies developing alternate energy sources. But that is what you get when the oil lobby writes the government's energy policy.

Another issue is fuel efficiency standards. The government has refused in recent years to increase these nearly enough. While China has fuel efficiency standards of around 35 mpg, and the European Union has fuel efficiency standards of over 40 mpg, here in the US we are stuck at around 23 mpg. The Model-T Ford from 100 years ago got 24 mpg. That is pathetic.

My computer processor is 100 times faster than one made 15 years ago, and it uses 10 times less energy to operate. My cell phone that has a color screen and is slightly larger than a credit card with a very tiny battery, operates for 5 days on a single battery charge. My cell phone from 12 years ago was the size of a brick with a huge battery, had a one line monochrome digital display, and operated for about 8 hours on a battery charge.

Efficiency can be increased a hundred times over if they really want to. But instead we are still using the same 100-year-old internal combustion engine. It's an old technology that should have died along with the steam engine.

You also may want to watch this movie:

http://www.sonyclassics.com/whokilledtheelectriccar/
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #32  
Old 08-08-2006, 02:30 PM
AzX5's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North of 110°F, City of Devils
Posts: 1,316
AzX5 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
I say we should invade Iraq to solve all our oil problems! Oh wait, never mind.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-09-2006, 01:01 PM
BradATL's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 91
BradATL is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric5273
They influence government policy through very powerful lobbying.
Definitely true.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric5273
Another issue is fuel efficiency standards. The government has refused in recent years to increase these nearly enough. While China has fuel efficiency standards of around 35 mpg, and the European Union has fuel efficiency standards of over 40 mpg, here in the US we are stuck at around 23 mpg. The Model-T Ford from 100 years ago got 24 mpg. That is pathetic.

My computer processor is 100 times faster than one made 15 years ago, and it uses 10 times less energy to operate. My cell phone that has a color screen and is slightly larger than a credit card with a very tiny battery, operates for 5 days on a single battery charge. My cell phone from 12 years ago was the size of a brick with a huge battery, had a one line monochrome digital display, and operated for about 8 hours on a battery charge.
I hear what you're saying about fuel economy, and I agree. Wish the feds had increased CAFE requirements years ago. But I do believe it would be even more effective to focus on the demand side of the equation (i.e., raise the gasoline tax).

Not sure I agree with your argument that car technology hasn't improved versus other products such as computers and cell phones. I think the price/performance of autos has improved dramatically over the past 30-40 years:

- emissions have been lowered 99%
- horsepower is way higher
- quality and reliability are a ton better
- safety is way higher (air bags, crush zones, dynamic stability control, better headlamps, car automatically calls for help following a collision a la BMW Assist, OnStar, etc.)
- handling and braking are way better
- features and creature comforts (park distance control, cruise control, automatic climate control, sound systems, NAV, steptronic, etc.)
- gas mileage is way better too (when adjusted for horsepower). I still remember my mom's 1979 Chrysler LeBaron. Had a V8 engine with 115 horsepower and got 12 MPG. Did 0-60 in like 13 seconds.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 AM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.