Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Fluid Motor Union
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-18-2006, 06:47 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The city that NEVER sleeps
Posts: 1,719
BMW X5 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gresch
only if the partition is in FAT, not NTFS

here's some info for everyone:

A blank unformatted disk is like a newly constructed parking lot with no lines.

Formatting puts the lines in and in those spaces, or blocks (the correct phrase) on a disk is where files are written. Blocks can vary in size and the size is determined by what the disk will be used for. For commone every day use like a home PC, a small block size is best as most files are small. On a machine that stores HUGE files, a bigger block size is best. Why? Because if you put a small file in a big block, whatever space that isn't used in the block is wasted (i.e. putting a 4k file in a 10k block wastes 6k or 60% of the space). Writing a HUGE file to small block sizes makes the disk work harder as it traverses all of those tiny blocks instead of doing a looooong read on a big block.

Another example: Say you've written 10 files to a disk and delete files 5 & 6 in the middle. The next time that the OS needs space to write a file it knows that the blocks taken up by files 5& 6 is available so it plunks all or part of the new file in that space. If the file is too big for the space, the OS writes a part of the file there, then seeks to a new spot and continues to write.

Why does this matter? Because now that new file is written all over the disk and to retrieve (open) it, the disk heads have to traverse all over the disk to get it.

What does defrag do? It reads the disk and puts all of those "fragmented" files back to together in 1 contiguous space so that when they are retrieved the drive does less work by reading the file from 1 place.

All of that being said, NTFS does a better job of not letting a disk get fragmented, while a FAT drive is usually a mess and needs to be defragged a lot.

*puts pocket protector away and continues on with day.

Have a nice day
NTFS does a better job but still sucks, running the windows built in is useless, i've got me diskeeper which is awesome
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #32  
Old 10-18-2006, 07:51 PM
Thunder22's Avatar
Wait... what?
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LI/TX
Posts: 11,154
Thunder22 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW X5
NTFS does a better job but still sucks, running the windows built in is useless, i've got me diskeeper which is awesome
true. but diskkeeper is dangerous in the noobie's hands
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:06 PM
PersonaNonGrata's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,749
PersonaNonGrata is on a distinguished road
Okay, thanks very much for the advice guys. It is a little above my head though so here is a screenshot of my Task Manager with the stats. What up?
Attached Images
 
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:16 PM
SuperGreg's Avatar
SuperHero
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Good Ol' USA
Posts: 7,794
SuperGreg is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by PersonaNonGrata
Okay, thanks very much for the advice guys. It is a little above my head though so here is a screenshot of my Task Manager with the stats. What up?
You have 47 processes running in the background. Get rid of at least 15 of them
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:33 PM
PersonaNonGrata's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 7,749
PersonaNonGrata is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperGreg
You have 47 processes running in the background. Get rid of at least 15 of them
Well, from what gresch seems to be saying, the number of processes isn't necessarily the problem. My CPU usage is at 0%. I'm not convinced that those processes are what's causing my apparent RAM usage. There are a bunch of other numbers there that I haven't clue 1 about.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:34 PM
Thunder22's Avatar
Wait... what?
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LI/TX
Posts: 11,154
Thunder22 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by PersonaNonGrata
Well, from what gresch seems to be saying, the number of processes isn't necessarily the problem. My CPU usage is at 0%. I'm not convinced that those processes are what's causing my apparent RAM usage. There are a bunch of other numbers there that I haven't clue 1 about.
it's simple to check, just click on the "processes" tab and then click on the "mem usage" column twice, it will sort all of the processes by memory useage from highest to lowest.
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-18-2006, 10:42 PM
SuperGreg's Avatar
SuperHero
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Good Ol' USA
Posts: 7,794
SuperGreg is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by PersonaNonGrata
Well, from what gresch seems to be saying, the number of processes isn't necessarily the problem. My CPU usage is at 0%. I'm not convinced that those processes are what's causing my apparent RAM usage. There are a bunch of other numbers there that I haven't clue 1 about.
The Ram usage in your screen shot looks fine to me
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-19-2006, 07:50 AM
SuaveX5's Avatar
Fatal Error !
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,797
SuaveX5 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperGreg
The Ram usage in your screen shot looks fine to me
__________________

Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it.
Autograph your work with excellence.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-19-2006, 09:04 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The city that NEVER sleeps
Posts: 1,719
BMW X5 is on a distinguished road
lol you got 47, I've got 63 and my CPU is at 0-3% the processes dont matter unless they are actually physically running, a lot of those are system processes, some are things that show up on your taskbar (anything that starts up and lurks in the background for quick access i.e. Instant messenger its a process while in the taskbar but it doesnt actually use anything up however it will help load faster) just open your processes tab in task manager and google each process with each one there should be an explanation of what it is and how to remove it should follow if not do a little search
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-13-2006, 08:38 PM
LeMansX5's Avatar
Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 20,269
LeMansX5 has a spectacular aura aboutLeMansX5 has a spectacular aura aboutLeMansX5 has a spectacular aura about
Another utility for monitoring processes(from Microsoft's acquisition of Sysinternals).
Process Monitor
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.