Birth control pill for men! - Page 2

blondboinsd · #11 11-29-2006, 12:17 PM

Agreed men cannot be trusted! :P

Sponsored Links

crosvs · #12 11-29-2006, 09:59 PM

that doesn't sound biologically ... safe or normal.

for example, what about the huge study(s) conducted lately finding a VERY strong inversely proportional link between ejaculation and prostate cancer?

turns out that men with fewer than 2 ejaculations per week are at least 1/3 more likely -- if i remember correctly -- than men with at last 4 or 5 per week. casual observation finds correllation to support this theory by monks, for example, who apparently have a particularly high incidence of prostate cancer, as men of older generations for whom ejaculation outside of sex was generally discouraged.

apparently the compounds in the prostate -- particularly the high concentration of zinc -- begins to "stagnate" as one report described it, and it is believed that this stagnation leads to cancerous cells and eventually full-blown prostate cancer.

google something to the effect of: "frequent orgasm prostate cancer study" -- the study, if i remember correctly, was conducted by either or both of an austrlian and/or british research institute.

so my point is- whereas you may be solving ONE problem by this pill, seems as though, if used regularly, you'd be causing a whole slew of DIFFERENT problems.

interestingly, the prostate/ejaculation theory seems relatively unwritten about. i have a feeling its ultimate implications -- have sex or masturbate -- are just a little too taboo for the general medical society to broadcast to the public.

aside: if memory serves, there was a study that suggested a factor leading to breast cancer in women was *NOT* breastfeeding children, for analogous reasons.

simply put: if the body is not allowed to function as it was designed to do, something is bound to go wrong.

that said, if they ARE able to produce a good, safe birth control for men, i think that would be fantastic: ironically, *I* have a hard time trusting girls with that stuff ... I'd rather be in control.

fln8tive · #13 11-29-2006, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by China Man

and will it give them massive mood swings????

You mean massive wood swings, no?

vinuneuro · #14 11-29-2006, 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GUINNESS

Hmmm... I think I'd pass. From the sounds of how it works, that would mean no more tastey treats for Nicole

I know we're pretty chill with most things here, but seriously man..this is ain't even close to appropriate even for our lounge.

crosvs · #15 11-29-2006, 10:54 PM

although i too was shocked, definitely thought it was pretty hilarious

Michelle · #16 11-29-2006, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vinuneuro

I know we're pretty chill with most things here, but seriously man..this is ain't even close to appropriate even for our lounge.

GUINNESS · #17 11-30-2006, 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vinuneuro

I know we're pretty chill with most things here, but seriously man..this is ain't even close to appropriate even for our lounge.

Vin, what are you talking about man? I was referring to a decrease in appetite as I've seen happen in Nicole when she was on the pill. If I have less appetite, I bring home less tastey treats, aka Krispy Kreme, ice cream, etc.

Besides... what's the big deal, we're all adults here (and if there's not adults here, they shouldn't be in this thread since they should not be having sex and concerned about birth control for men)

crosvs · #18 11-30-2006, 02:27 AM

Quicksilver · #19 11-30-2006, 02:53 AM

Talk about a little bit too much information. Whew.

Quote:

Originally Posted by crosvs

that doesn't sound biologically ... safe or normal.

for example, what about the huge study(s) conducted lately finding a VERY strong inversely proportional link between ejaculation and prostate cancer?

turns out that men with fewer than 2 ejaculations per week are at least 1/3 more likely -- if i remember correctly -- than men with at last 4 or 5 per week. casual observation finds correllation to support this theory by monks, for example, who apparently have a particularly high incidence of prostate cancer, as men of older generations for whom ejaculation outside of sex was generally discouraged.

apparently the compounds in the prostate -- particularly the high concentration of zinc -- begins to "stagnate" as one report described it, and it is believed that this stagnation leads to cancerous cells and eventually full-blown prostate cancer.

google something to the effect of: "frequent orgasm prostate cancer study" -- the study, if i remember correctly, was conducted by either or both of an austrlian and/or british research institute.

so my point is- whereas you may be solving ONE problem by this pill, seems as though, if used regularly, you'd be causing a whole slew of DIFFERENT problems.

interestingly, the prostate/ejaculation theory seems relatively unwritten about. i have a feeling its ultimate implications -- have sex or masturbate -- are just a little too taboo for the general medical society to broadcast to the public.

aside: if memory serves, there was a study that suggested a factor leading to breast cancer in women was *NOT* breastfeeding children, for analogous reasons.

simply put: if the body is not allowed to function as it was designed to do, something is bound to go wrong.

that said, if they ARE able to produce a good, safe birth control for men, i think that would be fantastic: ironically, *I* have a hard time trusting girls with that stuff ... I'd rather be in control.

crosvs · #20 11-30-2006, 11:51 AM

sorry?

Sponsored Links