thats why you need to go full tilt

I'm not sure why Acura/Honda would change the NSX when the Supra is coming back in 2008.......or maybe that is why the NSX changed direction?

__________________

An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting.

"promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare"

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

the NSX and Supra were in two completely different price catagories...not to mention the less expensive Supra was (and still is) ready and willing to beat on an NSX

__________________
Annoying people is easier than fishing with dynamite

__________________
Mike F
Current: 2017 Grand Cherokee HEMI
2017 Kawasaki ZX-14r
2017 Harley RG Ultra
2017 Harley Fatboy S

Please...the NSX was THE sportscar in 1990 when it debuted. It was better at everything than even most Ferrari's, while still being easily daily driveable. If Honda put their mind to it, they could've done it again.

The NSX has always been considered an exotic. Unless, Toyota goes crazy with this Supra it'll never be in that league.

Regarding this underpowered buisness, it runs 0-60 in 4.8s with a V6 putting out 290hp. That's still respectable acceleration.

Why the phuck Honda would do this is beyond me. Turn a perfectly good car into a GT by going from MR to front-engine and giving it a long ass hood and AWD.

As far as Honda goes, I'm done with them. I will continue to cherish my 98 Prelude Type-SH and drive it for years to come, but will not personally buy any vehicle of theirs produced after 2001. While my discontent with BMW exits, it is not nearly as severly; and isn't really relevant since I can't afford to buy any. And I can only influence my parents' pruchases so much lol.

psshh..i can get this at the grocery store

yea 290hp and 221 lb/ft of torque was rather respectable when it came out...it was the fact that it never got any better throughout the years...the car stayed the same and everything else passed it by 0-60 in 4.9 doesnt cut it for a 90k sports car and hasn't for the last 10 years

__________________
Annoying people is easier than fishing with dynamite

997 Porsche Carrera 4S: Base Price- $87,000, 355hp, 0-60: 4.6s.

Yes, the NSX was the first production vehicle to be entirely aluminum..

I'm not going to argue this matter with you further, so I suggest you quit it..

we aren't arguing you just proved my point the porsche is faster and cheaper than the current NSX

__________________
Annoying people is easier than fishing with dynamite