So you are saying that books written by the Deputy Director of the CIA and the Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs during the early 1960s are not reliable sources for investigating CIA activities during the early 1960s??

It's no wonder you don't want to debate this any longer. Everything you said in your last post has been proven wrong.

Before you said:
And now I have shown you that books were indeed written by agents who were involved. The question to be asked is, what would convince you that your position here is wrong? Would the CIA have to release a memo to all the mainstream media admitting guilt for a crime that happened 40 years ago? Fat chance that is going to happen.

__________________


my experience on X5world when I spend too much
time posting in political threads in the lounge...