Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2008, 08:05 AM
E61Silver's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 6,176
E61Silver is an unknown quantity at this point
More Vehicles Make Top Marks on Safety

There are numbers in safety.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety reported Tuesday that 72 vehicles for the 2009 model year received its top rating for protecting occupants in a crash. The total is more than double the number of vehicles named "top safety picks" last year. And a similar report for the 2007 model year included just 13 top-rated vehicles.

With so many cars performing well in crash tests, the Insurance Institute, a research group funded by the insurance industry, says it is looking for ways to make its tests more difficult.

For consumers, the longer list of top-rated vehicles means buyers have a wider range of choices. Indeed, the group says this is the first time every category of vehicle except one has been represented by at least one top-rated model. The only exception was the micro-car category, which the group created to accommodate the tiny two-seat Smart Fortwo. But the Smart narrowly missed getting top marks because its seats and head restraints provided inadequate protection.

Ford Motor Co. and its Volvo unit combined for 16 vehicles in the top-rated group. Honda Motor Co. and its Acura luxury division had 13. The Honda Fit was the first vehicle in the minicar category to be a top pick. Volkswagen AG and its Audi unit had nine models on the list, General Motors Corp. had eight, as did Toyota Motor Corp. and its Scion unit. Subaru, a unit of Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd., had four, as did Hyundai Motor Co. and its Kia unit. (For the full report, go to www.iihs.org.)

To receive the top rating, vehicles have to be available with electronic stability control and get a top score of "good" in front-, side- and rear-impact crash tests. Possible ratings in each category include good, acceptable, marginal and poor. They must also offer electronic stability control, either as standard or optional equipment.

Stability control uses sensors to detect when a vehicle is traveling away from its driver's intended path. Typically, the system manipulates the brakes and throttle to restore traction, slow the vehicle and help the driver regain control. According to the Insurance Institute, electronic stability control cuts the risk of a fatal single-vehicle accident in half and lowers the risk of a fatal rollover crash by as much as 70%.

Frontal and side impacts accounted for about 75% of the 28,896 vehicle occupants killed in crashes last year. Rear impacts are rarely fatal, though they often result in injuries like neck strain.

The main reason for the rapid improvement is that car makers have been working aggressively to turn safety into a selling point. For many car buyers, crash-test performance has moved ahead of creature comforts, styling, and horsepower on the list of must-have features.

Seeing safety as an opportunity to set their products apart from rival brands, car makers have been making changes to their vehicles' safety systems in order to improve crashworthiness. Several models that didn't make the list last year underwent design changes that helped their ratings this year. There are also vehicles that received top ratings this year in categories that weren't represented in last year's top picks.

"It's really amazing how quickly manufacturers have moved on safety in the past two years," says David Zuby, the Insurance Institute's head of vehicle research. "We are looking at things we might do to make the criteria more stringent."

Among the possible changes include making frontal crash tests more severe and rating the strength of vehicles' roofs, which can help protect occupants in rollover crashes. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the agency that sets federal auto-safety standards, has already toughened its standards, which will apply to passenger vehicles starting in the 2010 model year.

Write to Jonathan Welsh at [email protected]






http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1227...googlenews_wsj
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links

  #2  
Old 11-25-2008, 08:16 AM
E61Silver's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: X5world
Posts: 6,176
E61Silver is an unknown quantity at this point
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/default.aspx


The X5 gets top pick

The BMW 5 side impact level is still not great
http://www.iihs.org/ratings/ratingsbyseries.aspx?id=459

Every Honda gets top pick, why can't BMW do this?

Last edited by E61Silver; 11-25-2008 at 08:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-25-2008, 12:03 PM
FSETH's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 5,302
FSETH is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by x54.4blue
Every Honda gets top pick, why can't BMW do this?
Well the 3-series, X3 and X5 were top picks. The 5-series was not due to side impact issues. The main reason is that not all BMW's are tested by the IIHS. Where are the test results for the 1-series, 6-series, 7-series, X6 and Z4 (which is surprisingly safe in other crash tests)? I would bet that all of those have a good chance at being called Top Picks by the IIHS as well with only the 5-series falling short in one aspect of the test and the 3-series verts also falling short with regards to side impact.

BMW's are pretty safe overall.

Here is another site to consider. However, it does not cover every BMW model either.

http://www.euroncap.com/home.aspx

Last edited by FSETH; 11-25-2008 at 12:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-25-2008, 12:39 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 1,246
mrkbbd is on a distinguished road
the Toyota's only got "good" ratings, pretty surprising especially from the lexus brand
__________________
2006 BMW X5 4.8is Lemans Blue/Beige/Dark Maple
-Nav, Comfort Seats, Heated Steering Wheel,
Rear Airbags, AUX Input
2009 BMW M3 Space Grey/Black/Carbon
-all options
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-25-2008, 02:20 PM
Weasel's Avatar
Almost never on here anymore :(
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 6,892
Weasel will become famous soon enough
With the ever growing number of cars to get the "top safety pick" status, I wonder if it is time for the rating system to evolve... like the emmisions standards did. They went from LEV, ULEV, SULEV, etc... and now near zero emmisions vehicles. Maybe it's time to add a couple notches to the bar.
__________________
"When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all" (Bender, futurama)

You make something idiotproof, they'll make a better idiot


You think professional is expensive, just wait until you pay for amateur.

Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

X5 pics

RIP 4.6is.....

2003 4.6is
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2008, 02:14 AM
blondboinsd's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,823
blondboinsd is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FSETH
Well the 3-series, X3 and X5 were top picks. The 5-series was not due to side impact issues. The main reason is that not all BMW's are tested by the IIHS. Where are the test results for the 1-series, 6-series, 7-series, X6 and Z4 (which is surprisingly safe in other crash tests)? I would bet that all of those have a good chance at being called Top Picks by the IIHS as well with only the 5-series falling short in one aspect of the test and the 3-series verts also falling short with regards to side impact.

BMW's are pretty safe overall.

Here is another site to consider. However, it does not cover every BMW model either.

http://www.euroncap.com/home.aspx
They usually only test larger selling vehicles, they have not even tested my Touareg.

BMW's issue is that they have door mounted side airbags on many of their vehicles which is simply idiotic to me. Why would you put a side airbag in the door? Don't people have different seating lengths? My Treg has seat mounted side airbags as does nearly every other company.
__________________
The Present:
2014 Audi Q5 TDI Prestige
The Past:
2013 Lexus GS350
2013 VW Golf TDI
2007 BMW X5 4.8i LOADED & Loved
2009 VW Jetta
2008 VW Touareg VR6
2005 BMW X5 3.0i
2005 BMW Z4 3.0i
2004 BMW X5 3.0i
2003 BMW 325i
2000 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2008, 02:14 AM
blondboinsd's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,823
blondboinsd is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FSETH
Well the 3-series, X3 and X5 were top picks. The 5-series was not due to side impact issues. The main reason is that not all BMW's are tested by the IIHS. Where are the test results for the 1-series, 6-series, 7-series, X6 and Z4 (which is surprisingly safe in other crash tests)? I would bet that all of those have a good chance at being called Top Picks by the IIHS as well with only the 5-series falling short in one aspect of the test and the 3-series verts also falling short with regards to side impact.

BMW's are pretty safe overall.

Here is another site to consider. However, it does not cover every BMW model either.

http://www.euroncap.com/home.aspx
They usually only test larger selling vehicles, they have not even tested my Touareg.

BMW's issue is that they have door mounted side airbags on many of their vehicles which is simply idiotic to me. Why would you put a side airbag in the door? Don't people have different seating lengths? My Treg has seat mounted side airbags as does nearly every other company.
__________________
The Present:
2014 Audi Q5 TDI Prestige
The Past:
2013 Lexus GS350
2013 VW Golf TDI
2007 BMW X5 4.8i LOADED & Loved
2009 VW Jetta
2008 VW Touareg VR6
2005 BMW X5 3.0i
2005 BMW Z4 3.0i
2004 BMW X5 3.0i
2003 BMW 325i
2000 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer 4x4
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.