|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I am glad you were able to see the intent of my OP which was not to spew negativity about the BMW X5 because like I have said on many occasions, the X5 is a damn good vehicle. I agree with a lot of the MDX bashing that has taken place on this thread. However, after almost two weeks of ownership, the Acura MDX has proven to be a much better vehicle "for me". 1. The steering on the X5 felt tighter. 2. The suspension on the X5 felt tighter. 3. The overall driving dynamics on the X5 was better. 4. Hell even the front of the X5 looks better. These are not problems, flaws, or annoyances but rather observations. What I find interesting is how X5 loyalist have a very biased approach to how their vehicle should be judged by others. Anytime there is a discussion about how the X5 stacks up against another vehicle the performance attributes are ALWAYS the main selling point and that's okay. However, there are many people out there like myself who prefer a balance between performance and creature comforts and that SHOULD be okay as well. Besides, my Saturday errands consisting of runs to Costco, Target, and whatever else the wife wants don't include the Nuremburg or Autobahn tracks. 2010 Acura MDX 0-60 - 7.6 sec 2009 BMW X5 3.0i - 7.8 sec As you can see, 0-60 is a wash so in essence I get two tenths of a second better performance but with all the amenities, creatures comforts, and reliability I could ever ask for. As for the SH-AWD........I live out here in the desert so very little opportunity to test the capabilities of the SH-AWD. Quote:
Contrary to what others have experienced, even the 3.0i engine felt extremely snappy and responsive at highways speeds with 4 adults in the car.
Last edited by Lex2BMW; 02-16-2010 at 12:26 PM. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|