Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Fluid Motor Union
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #21  
Old 12-04-2010, 12:48 AM
m5james's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kirkland, WA to Alexandria, VA - Now in Marysville, WA
Posts: 4,001
m5james is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL View Post
I tend to agree that hands free makes sense when compared to holding a device. It makes sense to have your hands free to maneuver. But if we were really concerned about having hands free to maneuver, we would probably ban stickshifts and hand signals.

Studies seem to show that it is much more distracting speaking, and preparing to speak, than to listen. Using a phone isn't the same as having a conversation with a passenger, since a passenger is aware of things competing for the driver's attention.

See if you can find that 'handsfree is safer than handsheld' study. And studies conducted by makers of BT headsets don't count.

I think the reason that laws, where they have been enacted, focus on handheld devices is that they catch texters, and they are more easily sold, politically. The lawmakers have the studies in hand that show they are a misdirected law, ie if they want to reduce driver distraction and related accidents they should ban all telephone use. That would be a tough sell.
If I'm having a conversation for undetermined amount of time, then I'd have to have my hand off the wheel the ENTIRE time. In comparison, it is by no means necessary to hold the shift lever or turn signals but for that second or two that I'm using it.

I'm guessing that is a blanket study, but I know for a fact that when I'm riding my bike, I calm down and I'm not as edgy when I've got music playing vs listening to the drone of the exhaust....but as you stated, I'm only listening vs talking, so maybe my point is moot. I can agree that w/ you that me being in the car by myself that the other person on the line has no clue as to what's going on while I'm driving...but at the same time, just because someone is still talking, that doesn't mean I'm forced to pay attention. Ask my GF I know that in times of complete concentration, I don't even have the slightest clue of the things I've heard, so once again, just because the distraction is there, doesn't mean I'm paying attention to it at that moment.

I've not once quoted an actual study on here, nor am I going to start now. You said I can't site BT manufacturers, so can I site our own, the holy grail of safety, BMW itself (and countless other automobile manufacturers)? BMW sells it as a safety feature, do they not? As I said, I could probably find studies showing one vs the other, so who ever reads that study will always side w/ what they agree w/ anyways, just like our varying opinions on transmission servicing...I know what I've done, you know what you've done, and no one is going to tell use otherwise. I know from my own experience, that if I'm going to be talking period, what seems to make more logical sense to me. Dedicating an arm to hold a phone (and everything that comes w/ it that I've stated above) vs having my hands free only makes more sense in my eyes. I can even think of instances while working as well where using a BT is safer than holding a phone - I can still be removing a customers transmission w/ a BT in my ear...I can't do that holding a phone. If I can't have two hands free at a moments notice to remove a 300lb transmission, I sure as hell shouldn't be piloting 4000lbs down the road either.

I agree, it's easier to ticket people holding phones in general vs trying to decide if they we're texting or talking to someone. Not that I use it, but my phone can do just about everything via voice command, so in reality, I'd never need to hold it ever and I could still do all the same things I do today while driving. Cars are becoming the same way, from using the built-in phones, controlling the climate, music playing, etc. Based on the trend w/ electronics in cars, it seems that hands-free is what everyone is leaning towards...which I completely agree with. Banning cellphones all together, I think that'll be a tough sell unless they pull us over for seeing out lips moving...even w/o a BT in my ear, I've still got speakerphone or built-in BT in my stereo. I can see the future now....getting pulled over for singing a song while the officer next to me thinks I'm on the phone .
__________________

650hp 10 X5///M - Stage 2, Vibrant 1794's , gutted cats, custom intake, AC Forged 22's
325hp 98 BMW 740iL - ///M5 6spd, www.bavengine.com w/ Performance Option, electric fan, CF intake tube w/ heatshield, Mag 14816 w/ notched bumper, Bilstein/H&R Stage II/Powerflex

600+hp 02 Harley F150 - MHP900 Stage 3 engine, KB2.3, 8# lower, 60# inj, Walbro FP's

135hp 01 TL1000R - M4 full exhaust, K&N, Yosh box, -1/+2 gears, 2CT's

Last edited by m5james; 12-04-2010 at 01:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.