Interesting Art. on Smart Car...

[motordavid]

From the NewYawkTimes, a lil'Sat reading. With FoMoCo, GM and Dam-Chrysler's probs., I'm starting to think the auto mfg'ing biz will look a lot diff within the next decade.
(I hope the copyright nazis aren't lurking, lol!)

April 2, 2005

DaimlerChrysler to Scale Back Mini-Car Unit

By MARK LANDLER

RANKFURT, April 1 - How did a pint-size car named Smart manage to make DaimlerChrysler look, well, dumb?

On Friday, the company announced that it would drastically scale back its troubled Smart division, eliminating two models and cutting 700 employees, at a cost of up to 1.2 billion euros ($1.55 billion).

The move came after DaimlerChrysler racked up years of losses, as it struggled with Smart's high production costs and cumbersome distribution network, which had been kept separate from existing Mercedes dealerships.

DaimlerChrysler's missteps, critics said, hobbled what should have been a car that is perfect for its times: fuel-efficient and tiny enough so that two could fit into the parking space of a single full-size American car.

"To make a two-seat car, stripped down for urban environments, was an absolutely great idea," said Ferdinand Dudenhöffer, the director of the Center for Automotive Research in Gelsenkirchen. "But then they made a lot of mistakes and wrong decisions."

DaimlerChrysler's chairman, Jurgen E. Schrempp, said the company considered shutting down Smart altogether, but concluded that this salvage plan, which aims to make Smart profitable by 2007, would be less costly.

"Why should we destroy brand equity, which is by any standard worth $2 billion or more, when we have a cost problem?" Mr. Schrempp said in a tense conference call with analysts and reporters.

Several analysts bluntly questioned DaimlerChrysler's decision, saying they saw little prospect of Smart's ever making money, particularly since the company, which is based in Stuttgart, plans to keep selling a money-losing, four-seat version of the original two-seat Smart.

"They're sticking to their old strategy," said Arndt Ellinghorst, an auto analyst at Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein in Frankfurt. "This is the easy solution for Schrempp, and a bad solution for shareholders."

Coming a day after Mercedes-Benz announced a recall of 1.3 million cars to fix problems in electronics systems, the announcement added to the picture of a company still lurching from crisis to crisis.

Shares of DaimlerChrysler declined slightly in Frankfurt, where they were among the most heavily traded.

DaimlerChrysler insisted that the cutbacks would not affect a possible introduction of the two-seat Smart in the United States. The company is developing a new version that will meet American road and safety requirements. Smart's problem, the company said, is its high cost, not lack of appeal.

"The U.S. provides an additional opportunity, a significant opportunity," Eckhard Cordes, the head of the Mercedes-Benz car group, which oversees Smart, said during the call. "Our experience in Canada is extremely encouraging as to market acceptance of the product."

In Canada, where Smart has been available since October, the sales, at 3,000 cars, have exceeded expectations. Still, Mr. Cordes said the plan to make Smart profitable did not hinge on bringing it to the United States.

In Europe, the market for so-called city cars is already fiercely competitive and about to get more so, with the introduction of three vehicles from Peugeot, Citroën, and Toyota, all manufactured in the Czech Republic in a joint venture of PSA Peugeot Citroën of France and Toyota of Japan.

Smart's roots go back to 1993, when DaimlerChrysler's predecessor, Daimler-Benz, began studying the viability of a mini-car. The next year, it set up a novel joint venture with Swatch, the watchmaker, to build one. Swatch dropped out of the partnership in 1998, but Daimler pressed on, introducing its first model, the City-Coupe in Western Europe that fall.

Smart soon became a quirky presence on the serpentine streets of European cities. In Rome, where the car is especially popular, it can be found wedged into comically tight parking spaces, like a latter-day Vespa.

But Smart's perky image has not translated into volume sales. DaimlerChrysler sold 167,900 cars in 2004, less than half that of the midsize Mercedes C-Class and 15 percent of total Mercedes sales.

Part of the problem is price. At 9,000 euros ($11,664), the Smart is not cheap for its size. "Their competitor is a Fiat, a Peugeot, a Toyota," Mr. Ellinghorst said. "That is why they are having such pricing problems."

Moreover, because DaimlerChrysler set up dedicated dealerships, it focused on major cities neglecting rural and suburban areas where Mr. Dudenhöffer contends it could have found additional customers.

DaimlerChrysler's efforts to expand the Smart brand have misfired. A roadster version sold poorly, and was widely derided by auto critics as looking like a toy. The company considered building a sport utility vehicle, initially viewing it as an entry model for the United States. To critics, that seemed to fly in the face of Smart's appeal, which is its compactness.

"Does the U.S. really need another S.U.V?" Mr. Dudenhöffer said. "Everybody is selling an S.U.V."

As part of the changes announced Friday, the roadster and the S.U.V. were scrapped. But DaimlerChrysler will retain the four-seat Smart, known as the forfour, which has drawn similar criticism.

It is building the car in cooperation with Mitsubishi Motor, the ailing Japanese carmaker. DaimlerChrysler had a broader partnership with Mitsubishi until last year when it announced it would not help bail it out.

Most of Smart's losses are from the forfour; Mr. Cordes said the two-seater was profitable "on a cash basis." But he said the cost of scrapping the larger model would be greater than trying to make it profitable.

That did not satisfy analysts, who peppered him and Mr. Schrempp with sharp questions not just about Smart, but about problems ranging from the Mitsubishi deal to the deteriorating quality at Mercedes.

The recall, which is the largest in Mercedes history, troubled analysts because it covers some models produced this year. That seems to contradict statements by Mr. Schrempp that the Mercedes-Benzes now rolling off the assembly line are as high quality as any in its history.

Mr. Cordes said the problems, which include faulty voltage regulators, stem from a supplier, not Mercedes itself. "I don't want to be aggressive," he said at one point, "but I think some of you are prejudiced."

[UCrewX5]

They had a Smart booth at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit this year, and I really like these cars. The one that was a real eye catcher was the Smart Roadster. Here's some pictures of the Roadster Coupe, but I liked the Roadster Cabrio

[motordavid]

J: Nice pics of a couple pretty cool cars, thanks!

Dunno, we may be in denial here in US, vis a vis the petro price situ.

I realize 10 million car buyers aren't running out today to toss their F150s, SUVs, etc., for hybrids or midgiecars, but cool city type cars that are "tolerable" on less than multi-state runs should be peaking somebody's interest.

It seems to me, almost regardless of whom one is or does, it makes some sense to start thinking of some kinda ride that does better than 12-14 city and maybe, 17-18 on the hwy. The Euros will remind us that they've been paying 3.75 to 5 bucks+ for years, but that diff is mostly taxes and the avg Euro doesn't make a Edinburgh to Madrid run for a longish weekend.

Not tree hugging or "drive whatcha want" bashing...but, I doubt anyone's kids here, will be driving HumVees in the 2020s.

OTOH, we could take all the oil we want/need by sunset, but that's another arm wrestle, lol! (YankeeDawg remark for today.)
BR,md