|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My issue with Ayres has to do with his background and his very radical ideology. He likes Obama and even announced his campaign coming out party in his home. The foundation he has provided millions to push his radical agenda on school kids which Obama helped organize and run. Ayres has no apologies for his past and in fact still holds the same radical beliefs. Instead of working with bombs he now works with dollars but his agenda has not changed. Obama was very much a part of his activities as seen in his participation in Ayres foundation. Now Obama wants to be the President of the United States and does not want anyone to know about or talk about his past and present associations. Look at his patterns not just Ayres. Rev. Wright and other show who Obama chooses to associate with and though he is one of the most Liberal Senators in his short time his history revels more about his radical beliefs. He's been able to move to the Left to get elected but I fear his real agenda will ultimately harm America. If you and others feel comfortable ignoring this side of Obama then go ahead. Eric does not seem to care that Ayres used bombs because he believes you should be able to do anything illegal or not to change the direction of America. I'm betting that Eric is in the minority. Those of you who say Ayres and Wright don't matter make me worry even more. Good day...I'm off to do a couple of hours worth of work and then do my part to stimulate the economy by shopping for some new toys. |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Responses to your thoughts with some more of mine....
Quote:
I am afraid you missed my point. I recognize the difference and make the distinction between "chatter" and "talking politics" and when it digresses to "obsessive, silly and inconsequential" posts. From what I have been reading most recently of your posts, it seems like they are starting to voice what some (me), may interpret as somewhat of a superior attitude along with unpleasant sarcasm. Don't get me wrong. I appreciate well placed appropriate sarcasm, but yours are not of that vein. Oh, by the way, I also went thought a short phase of experimenting using various "Smiles" but grew tired of their silliness, realizing that they ultimately can and usually do distract and detract from the point being made in the narrative. For such serious topics they tend to trivialize and juvenilize you and your points, having the opposite intended effect. As far as posts go, as a previous owner of two BMW X5's and with my wife currently having a 335ci, more than 2/3's of my posts in this forum are on BMW-related topics, primarily for X5's and the X6, (sort of appropriate for the BMW X5world forum, don't you think....). From what I can see the vast majority of your posts, of the 14,854 posts, (and counting.... at 11.3 posts per day!), have been made in the "Lounge" and now the politics sub-forum, and are non-BMW related. Are you still interested in discussing BMW's at all or just focusing on politics? I am curious. Do you also do a "cut & past" of your posts here on some other political blog which would be a more appropriate venue for this topic and where you would be exposed to even more different opinions? If so, which one? AVB-AMG
__________________
My current & recent car history: 2020 BMW 440i xDrive Coupe (Wife's daily driver) 2016 BMW X5M (My daily driver) 2014 BMW M6 Coupe (gone) 2013 BWM 335i xDrive Coupe (gone) 2011 BMW 335xi turbo coupe (gone) 2007 Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG (gone) 2007 BMW 335ci twin turbo coupe (gone) 2004 Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG (gone) 2004 BMW X5 4.4i (w/full Aero Kit - gone) 2001 BMW X5 4.4i (w/full Aero Kit - gone) 2000 Mercedes-Benz E430 Sport (gone) 1961 Mercedes-Benz 190SL (owned for 48 years) |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not sure what your point is here. You don't like reading political threads that what, you don't agree with? Don't like the tone of? or Can't express an opinion on? Frankly I don't really care as you seem to be the ONLY person who has ever expressed this in the years I've been on this forum. I'll give you credit for trying your little jabs such as "cut and paste" and what not. Really I'd prefer that you simply address an opinion, but I'm guessing you can't for one reason or another.
__________________
An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting. "promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ummm, for those people who do not feel like reading posts 9 thru 13, let me summarize with a picture and Webster's definition....
![]() Quote:
Now back to your Obama/Ayres political bantering.
__________________
Originally Posted by Roc3b "Great, so Gman landed a nympho with a brain! Damn him! Guinness you lucky son of a byotch!!!!!!!!!!!" ![]() http://www.bmwcca.org http://www.sunbeltbmwcca.org |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Awesome.
__________________
An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting. "promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, I read posts 9 through 13. I think that AVB-AMG has a point. I don't think there is a problem with political posts per se, but the excessive detail about trivia gets tiresome, not acknowledging both sides of an issue is even more tiresome, and those are the conclusions that I took away from his first post in this thread. Yes, this is the political forum. That isn't the issue. How about a debate, and not name-calling, or continuous sarcasm? Nobody here wants to be called a bully I presume.
On a side note: Wagner, what do you have against the Gauls? I know they are French, and that creates challenges for some Americans, but lets be tolerant now.... Carry on. (shamelessly lifted from one of our favourite two 'Vette drivers).
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
How about this: Republicans...Bad Democrats...Worse I'm voting for the lesser of two evils. |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
X5 4.4 E46 M3 Vert |
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why don't you instead vote for one of the many other candidates. Surely one of them must represent your views more than these two. How about Bob Barr? He's a good conservative and would surely be closer to what you believe than McCain. If you think voting for a third party is wasting your vote, just remember that your vote means nothing anyway since you are in CA. Obama is going to win your state by a landslide regardless of whether you vote or not. So why not instead use your vote to protest the two party system by voting for someone who you actually like.
__________________
![]() my experience on X5world when I spend too much time posting in political threads in the lounge...
|
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|