USSA

[x5GuyInLA]

Originally Posted by chonko

This saga with the secret video about Khalidi and Obama reminds of Norm Coleman and the British MP George Galloway in 2003.
During the hearing, Norm Coleman claimed that he had evidence in front of him to prove that George Galloway got oil deals from Saddam Hussein.
George Galloway called him on it, looking straight at Norm Coleman, Galloway said" Senator you have nothing on me". I remember how stupid Norm Coleman looked because frankly speaking he had nothing other than some cooked up rubbish.

This episode of this soap opera seems to have the same set of producers- it is all complete rubbish.

This might be complete rubbish, except for the fact that it's the LA Times who says they have the tape. They are not only a liberal publication, but have also endorsed Obama. Why would they be trying to cook something up on someone they support? If there really isn't anything to worry about on the tape, why wouldn't they just show it to shut everyone up? And if they are protecting their source, why doesn't the source want it shown unless there is something that would bring doubt to Obama?