Cash for clunkers - a bad idea

[X5rolls]

Washington lawmakers are drafting a large economic stimulus package to help create jobs and rebuild infrastructure. They want to include a nationwide scrappage program which would give U.S. tax dollars to consumers who turn-in older cars to have them crushed, as a misguided attempt to spur new car sales. The lawmakers need to scrap this idea.

The stimulus package is being drafted right now. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wants to introduce the bill on January 6 and have it approved by Congress by January 20, so that President Obama can sign it into law after he is inaugurated.

Contact House Speaker Nancy Pelosi IMMEDIATELY To Oppose Cash for Clunkers!
Call: 202-225-0100
Click here to send an electronic message: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/ Talking Points
Feel free to use any of the statements below as a starting point for your message to Speaker Pelosi.

• I am [calling/writing] to urge lawmakers not to include a “Cash for Clunkers” provision in the economic stimulus bill. Owners who turn in vehicles for crushing would receive a "minimal" payment to purchase a new car. This is a misguided attempt to spur car sales and claim that the country’s air quality or fleet fuel mileage is being improved.
• I work for [company name] located in [city and state]. My company is part of the specialty automotive industry, an industry which enables consumers to enhance their vehicle’s appearance, performance, comfort, convenience and safety. “Cash for Clunkers” programs deny our small businesses the availability of older cars necessary to develop and market their products and services. The programs will hurt my company and our customers.
• “Cash for Clunkers” programs threaten enthusiasts nationwide with the loss of valuable parts and parts-cars for repair, restoration, and customization projects. The programs also risk destroying classic, historic and special-interest vehicles, our American heritage.
• Cars turned in for scrappage often barely run, or are rarely-driven second or third vehicles that have a minimal impact on overall fuel economy or emissions.
• “Cash for Clunkers” programs will reduce the availability of affordable transportation and repair parts used by low-income drivers. It will also compete with the Salvation Army, the Purple Heart and other charities that rely on vehicle donations to raise money.
• “Cash for Clunkers” ignores better policy options. If Congress wants to act, support for repair and upgrade is a better choice and a win-win for consumers, dealers, manufacturers and repair shops. Significant emissions and fuel economy improvements can be achieved in older vehicles through relatively simple and inexpensive means: repaired/replaced exhaust systems, tune-ups, etc.
• We hope we can count on you to reject “Cash for Clunkers.” Thank you for your consideration on this very important matter.

If you choose to send a message to Speaker Pelosi, please send a copy of your message to SEMA also:
E-mail: [email protected]
Fax: 202/783-6024

[ylwjacket]

is this for real? even pelosi can't be this stupid.

[Meiac09]

It's to help all the poor suckers who bought hybrids offset the astronomic recycling costs.

[AzNMpower32]

Why don't we use that money to find more environmentally friendly ways to recycle our cars, like the EU does. Something like 90% of a new BMW can be recycled. Pity we don't have the means here.

[X5rolls]

It's for real - SEMA is trying to gain support and have this stopped.

[JCL]

We've had a provincial Scrap-It program for years. It seems to work well to get older, higher-polluting cars, off the roads. Junkers and cars that are parked don't qualify. Rebates depend on the difference in emissions between the old vehicle and the new method of transportation (car, public transit, bicycle, etc).

I don't think it makes sense to run a scrap car program to promote new car sales, but to cut exhaust emissions it is cheaper overall than tax credits on hybrids or diesels.

[X5rolls]

We have a huge aftermarket for parts on old cars and lots of people restore them. They are not driven as often so I don't see the advantage of this type of program. We need to try to keep as many of the old cars around for restoration purposes, for the parts, for the hobby.

I've used parts from doaner cars for my 67 mustang and lots of the guys I know who restore cars are always scrounging for parts.