Speaking of Sen. Dodd...

[X5rolls]

Oops... guess I did make the loophole for AIG bonus payments.

"Going back and looking, I apologize," he said when questioned about his words from the day before.

Honest Government... yeah, right.

Dodd admits to role in AIG loophole - CNN.com

CNN) -- After denying having anything to do with crafting language in the stimulus bill that allowed bailed-out insurance giant American International Group to keep its bonuses, Sen. Christopher Dodd admitted that he and the Treasury Department were responsible for the loophole.
Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Connecticut, says he was unaware of the AIG bonuses until last week.





Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, acknowledged his role in the change after a Treasury Department official told CNN the administration pushed for the language.
Both Dodd and the official, who asked not to be named, said it was because administration officials were afraid the government would face lawsuits if bonus contracts were breached.

The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for comment.

Congress last month passed a bill that President Obama signed into law, allowing AIG to keep its bonuses. For days, no one would say who was responsible for the loophole that let that happen.

The $787 billion stimulus bill included a measure from Dodd to limit executive bonuses strictly. But slipped inside at the last minute was an exemption for bonuses agreed to "on or before February 11, 2009." That allowed AIG to go ahead with its controversial bonuses.

On Tuesday, Dodd denied that he had anything to do with adding the language.




"When I left the Senate, it was not in there. So when I wrote the language, there was no such language like that," he said then.
But, saying his previous comments had been misconstrued, Dodd said Wednesday that he added the exemption after getting pressure from the Treasury Department.

"I agreed reluctantly," Dodd said. "I was changing the amendment because others were insistent."

Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, told CNN's Dana Bash and Wolf Blitzer that Obama officials pushed for the language to an amendment designed to limit bonuses and "golden parachutes" at those companies.

He said Wednesday that the "grandfather clause" language "seemed like innocent modifications" at the time. Watch Dodd's interview with CNN's Bash »
But that change ultimately allowed AIG to go ahead with doling out $165 million in bonuses. The federal government rescued the company from financial ruin with more than $170 billion in taxpayer assistance. Taxpayers now own nearly 80 percent of AIG.

Dodd said he did not speak to high-ranking administration officials, and the change came after his staff spoke with staffers from Treasury.


In a statement later Wednesday, Dodd said that his amendment allows the Treasury Department to review bonus contracts such as AIG's and seek ways to get the money back for taxpayers. Who's insured by AIG? »
Propelled by the outrage across the country, the House of Representatives planned to vote Thursday on a bill that would apply a 90 percent tax to bonuses paid out of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which was approved last year to stabilize the financial sector.

The bill affects companies getting $5 billion or more in TARP funds and bonuses paid out by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It would apply to people making more than $250,000 a year.

Trying to quell the outrage and move the country forward, Obama said Wednesday to put the blame on him.

"Everybody's pointing fingers at each other and saying it's their fault, the Democrats' fault, the Republicans' fault. Listen, I'll take responsibility. I'm the president," he said at a town hall meeting in Costa Mesa, California.
The president did not directly address the language change.

AIG's derivatives branch is in Dodd's home state. Many of the bonuses in question were awarded to executives at that branch. But in his statement, Dodd said he had no idea the legislation would affect the company.

"Let me be clear -- I was completely unaware of these AIG bonuses until I learned of them last week," he said.

Dodd also said in the statement that his comments on Tuesday and Wednesday to CNN did not conflict.

"I answered a question by CNN [Tuesday] night regarding whether or not [an exemption before] a specific date was aimed at protecting AIG," he said. "When I saw that my comments had been misconstrued, I felt it was important to set the record straight -- that this had nothing to do with AIG."

According to a transcript of the Tuesday interview, Dodd was asked about an executive-compensation provision "that exempts everything prior to February 11, 2009 -- any contracts prior to that date."

iReport.com: AIG stands for 'Actually, it's government'

He said that language was not in the version of the bill that left the Senate and that he was not one of the negotiators who hammered out a compromise between the House and Senate versions of the plan.
"I can't point a finger at someone who offered a change at all," he said.
Asked whether he later had been able to figure out who added the language, he said, "I really don't know."

In Wednesday's interview, Dodd never said his Tuesday comments had been misunderstood.

"Going back and looking, I apologize," he said when questioned about his words from the day before.





On Capitol Hill on Wednesday, AIG chief executive Edward Liddy called the roughly $165 million in bonuses "distasteful" but necessary because of legal obligations and competition.


"I've asked those who received retention payments in excess of 100,000 or more to return at least half of those payments. Some have already stepped forward and offered to give up 100 percent of their payments," said Liddy, who joined AIG after the bailout. E-mail to a friend


Share this on:


Mixx Digg Facebook del.icio.us reddit StumbleUpon MySpace









| Mixx it | Share


CNN's Ted Barrett and Sandra Endo contributed to this report.

[bmw2539]

LOL... SOMEONE from the Treasury department asked him to include the provision and he Doesn't remember who ummm.... WTF???!?!??!?!

ohhh snap... I just realized this is my first post in almost 3 years

[LobsterX]

Originally Posted by bmw2539

LOL... SOMEONE from the Treasury department asked him to include the provision and he Doesn't remember who ummm.... WTF???!?!??!?!

ohhh snap... I just realized this is my first post in almost 3 years

If he is that forgetful, he doesnt need to be in the legislative body of this country. Its too risky.

[Eric5273]

Originally Posted by LobsterX

If he is that forgetful, he doesnt need to be in the legislative body of this country. Its too risky.

If you believe he is that forgetful, then I have a bridge to sell you....

[LobsterX]

Originally Posted by Eric5273

If you believe he is that forgetful, then I have a bridge to sell you....

Man cant you take a tongue-in-cheek comment? Oh and btw, I cant afford that bridge...

[Wagner]

Originally Posted by LobsterX

Man cant you take a tongue-in-cheek comment? Oh and btw, I cant afford that bridge...

Sure you can, convince Obama you need a stim check for it.

[LobsterX]

Originally Posted by Wagner

Sure you can, convince Obama you need a stim check for it.

[Eric5273]

Originally Posted by Wagner

Sure you can, convince Obama you need a stim check for it.

Maybe he'll even give some extra so he can buy the two tall buildings in the background.

[JVegas]

Originally Posted by Eric5273

Maybe he'll even give some extra so he can buy the two tall buildings in the background.

That supposed to be funny?

[Eric5273]

Originally Posted by JVegas

That supposed to be funny?

Just a sarcastic way of pointing out how the government likes to hand out money, even when there is no good reason to do so.