Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > Politics Forum
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 02-25-2011, 11:48 PM
JCL's Avatar
JCL JCL is offline
Premier Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 11,853
JCL will become famous soon enoughJCL will become famous soon enough
I understand the difficulties in raising taxes on fuel, and if it ended up in a general government revenue fund it would only potentially impact demand, while not doing anything to accelerate the development of alternatives.

But it doesn't have to be a net tax increase, if government can cut other programs to fund investment in new technologies.

Three years ago our provincial government implemented a carbon tax. It was revenue neutral, in that average consumers and earners came out identically, and there were additional tax benefits worked in to it to help very low income families. For those that doubted government, there was legislation that required the government to show how all the tax collected was returned to taxpayers in other ways, each year. There were also inevitably some winners and losers. If you had very inefficient home heating, and consumed more gas than the average household, you lost (until you invested in more insulation or a better furnace, if that was possible). If you had the ability to change your behaviour, or were low consumers of fossil fuels, you could win. We won, as we chose to move closer to work, downsize our rather empty large house, buy more fuel efficient cars, and so on. We wanted to do some of those things anyway, it wasn't all because of the tax, but we came out ahead personally. Across the larger population though, whether directly or indirectly, what the new tax did was to start (slowly) to shift the tax burden so that it was more directly linked to excessive consumption of fossil fuels, whether for transportation, heating, or industry. It was intended to change behaviours. I found it interesting how much support the tax received from the general population. I think it is one example of how government can, as X5rolls put it, provide a framework to support the desired end result, in this case for both consumers and industry.

I agree that electric vehicles will not have an immediate benefit in locations where power is primarily produced by coal or natural gas (we have a lot of hydro power here). I think that anticipating a potential shift to electric vehicles means that attention should be paid to cleaning up power stations, and not just tailpipes.
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White

Retired:
2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey
2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver

2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey
2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:38 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.