Gerald Celente 10/19/2012

[blktoptrvl]

Originally Posted by tynashracing

As for Alex Jones...his delivery isn't refined. He doesn't use a tele-promter. He's probably one of the last real investigative journalists out there with an audience that is reaching millions per week on his daily radio program. I guess being a nut job is paying off for him.
While I don't agree with a lot of what he says...I appreciate that there is at least an opposing voice out there.

Is this the guy you 'appreciate?'

Alex Jones' Piers Morgan Rant: Radio Host Unleashes Explosive Pro-Gun Tirade (VIDEO)

[tynashracing]

Originally Posted by blktoptrvl

Is this the guy you 'appreciate?'

Alex Jones' Piers Morgan Rant: Radio Host Unleashes Explosive Pro-Gun Tirade (VIDEO)

Awwww...did you feel bad for poor Piers?

That guy is a total DB...how about this one:

Piers Morgan Blows Up on Larry Pratt Over Gun Rights - 12/18/2012 - YouTube

Yeah, I'd much rather have A.J. on my team than P.M.


I like this link better for the A.J. rant:
» Alex Jones to Piers Morgan: “You Are NOT Going to Take Our Guns” Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Or, this one:
» Alex Jones: Best Night of Television Ever Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Piers Morgan...
» Deluded Piers Morgan Compares Himself To John Lennon Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

And there's this:
» Piers Morgan, Friend of Drone Assassin Obama, Calls Alex Jones “Scary” Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

[motordavid]

No old philosopher here, and not a doom expert, but I have been reading/hearing this kind of rant for most of my 6 1/2 decades on our little planet...it has especially ramped up the past few years.

Not a Pollyanna and not saying those kinds of apocalyptic/chaotic things can't or will not happen, but I don't need that line of guesses/predictions to warn me. I don't find anything 'new' or close to a revelation in his stuff...
GL, mD

[tynashracing]

Originally Posted by motordavid

No old philosopher here, and not a doom expert, but I have been reading/hearing this kind of rant for most of my 6 1/2 decades on our little planet...it has especially ramped up the past few years.

Not a Pollyanna and not saying those kinds of apocalyptic/chaotic things can't or will not happen, but I don't need that line of guesses/predictions to warn me. I don't find anything 'new' or close to a revelation in his stuff...
GL, mD

motordavid, I've only been on this planet for 49 1/2 years. But, really only started to question the actions of TPTB after the '08 crisis. I've been in finance for 25 years and have placed too much trust in what we're told is all in our best interest when it comes to monetary control and other areas where our lives are influenced by "their" decisions/actions.
In my quest for information, I've been exposed to the likes of Celente. I find him entertaining in some of the same ways that people love Jim Cramer on CNBC.
Celente was a client at MF Global and supposedly lost 6 figures in that debacle...which he calls a criminal act.
When the MF Global situation unfolded...it became clear that customer segregated accounts were now on the table for the vultures to invade...whether mistakenly or not.
I know that if I were to invade one or all of my clients accounts...I'd be put in jail/prison in a NY minute. These are serious issues. I'm glad you're way ahead in this game. Sounds like you've already gained critical thinking with regard to how our world works. Kudos to you! I'm still learning and feel like I've got a lot of catching up to do! Maybe there are others like me that have gleaned a thing or two from the videos I've posted. I hope so.

[blktoptrvl]

Originally Posted by tynashracing

I will say this...as this is MY THREAD...and was ORIGINALLY about Gerald Celente (1) and not Alex Jones...the only reason I find your thoughts contradictory is because you are limiting peoples (2) RIGHTS with your thoughts about creating limitations on gun ownership. I find you to be quite judgmental (3) for someone that wants to protect "Rights" above all else...not even trade them for "magic beans"

(5)Again, no mention of real issues facing citizens of the USA...gangs, abortions, pharmaceuticals, suicide, knives, hammers, clubs, etc. It's just guns...I just find it odd that it's just guns that outrage you to the point that you're looking to pick a fight on a thread that wasn't even about GUNS(6). And, I'm the one with the problem?

Why did you decide to post your diatribe (4) on this thread??? Why not the one that was about "Gun Control"? Seems odd to me. Well, maybe not if I'm correct that you're looking for a fight and needed to throw your ad hominems directly at me. What did I piss you off in another thread? Did I somehow make you feel insecure about yourself? Again, why this thread?

I think it's pretty clear that you are not from the REPUBLIC You must have some other form of tyranny that you're concerned about. Your signature doesn't jive with what a PATRIOT of the REPUBLIC would stand for with regards to protecting peoples "Rights". I ASSUMED that you might have been a PATRIOT of the REPUBLIC...that's obviously NOT the case. You're the person from "various"

But seriously, best wishes in your life and may you and your loved ones be kept safe from harm...and I'm not being sarcastic. In the end, most of us are just humans that were made in Gods image trying to figure out what all this means and how to protect our loved ones from tyrannical/evil forces that would prefer to enslave us.

Now, go ahead and tell me what a bad person I am and how I shouldn't own a gun.

(2) Where in the constitution does it declare unlimited rights to arms? I have not studied the big 'C', but believe it say something about a "well regulated" militia. But even more I think a persons right to life trumps another persons "right" to the means of mass murder. (3)Judgmental? OK. I have an opinion and I have expressed it.

(1)As to why I commented in this thread, Yes, this thread started with you promoting Gerald Celente. I commented that it was non-sense. YOU then switched to state that you actually favored Alex Jones. I later came across an Alex Jones rant and commented on that. If you don't want people's opinions maybe you shouldn't start threads. My DIATRIBE (4)as you so wrongly use the word wasn't at all, it was a critique of someone YOU mentioned in your thread.

(5)I commented earlier in this thread that this guy was "Paranoia. And rambling nonsense." There was no theme to this thread other than his nonsensical rambling - at least that is where it started. If you want to have a discussion about other issues, then I think you should post them and see who responds. If it is one huge mish-mash of everything some paranoid wants to mention in a video, then I have no interest.

Why did I bring up guns and try to pick a fight on that one issue? My insecurity about myself? I am not from the REPUBLIC!

CAN YOU HEAR YOURSELF?

(6)Again, read what you wrote. I got onto the subject of guns while commenting on the contents of the videos posted by both you and I. YOU THEN WANTED TO KNOW HOW I WOULD HANDLE THE GUN ISSUE - I responded to your question. And this whole thing about the republic - wow!

I think you should go back and read this thread from top to bottom. Maybe you will see what was really being discussed and at what times.

I am not sure what to say to you at this point. You have no consistency of thought, you are like that Celente fellow rambling from one paranoid subject to another. You bring up issues and then get upset at others for disagreeing or "trying to start a fight."

I don't think you are a bad person - maybe confused. I am sorry if this thread got you bent out of shape. If you prefer, I will be happy to drop it.

[JCL]

I just want to know how controlling hammer ownership is going to reduce mass murders.

And I am waiting for a comment from the OP on Alex Jones and why alternative news sources have started to delisted him for, as they say, presenting ideas "that are buried under so many wild claims, tabloid style rhetoric, fear-mongering, and misleading conclusions that sifting the valid points from the misinformation would take more time than most folks have the patience for."

Upon reflection, I can understand why perhaps that style would appeal to the OP.

[tynashracing]

Boo hooo. Mean ole A.J. is just too brash for the TRULY DOMESTICATED types.

Google DEMOCIDE...it's gone parabolic

I'd say, mission accomplished...but to the TRULY DOMESTICATED...it was harsh to see him hold court on a BS cable show.

CNN...so fake, you'd almost believe it's real!

[blktoptrvl]

Originally Posted by tynashracing

Boo hooo. Mean ole A.J. is just too brash for the TRULY DOMESTICATED types.

Google DEMOCIDE...it's gone parabolic

I'd say, mission accomplished...but to the TRULY DOMESTICATED...it was harsh to see him hold court on a BS cable show.

CNN...so fake, you'd almost believe it's real!

WTF? I leave you to your own devices.

[tynashracing]

Originally Posted by blktoptrvl

WTF? I leave you to your own devices.

Really...Fuck Off! I wasn't even talking to you.

Now, back on track:

[JCL]

OP:

I'd say you are making yourself look really foolish

Originally Posted by tynashracing

I'd say mission accomplished