Quote:
Originally Posted by sunny5280
(Post 1031715)
Uh no. No I did not. Can it happen? Sure. Is it likely to happen in any meaningful numbers to draw the conclusion changing it will result in transmission damage? No data has been provided to make such an assertion. Likewise I highly doubt BMW would recommend such a procedure.
Good. Then from now on, at least when it comes to 2002 - 2006 model year E53's we'll see you recommending 100K miles transmission change intervals. Yes?
|
You said you considered it was untrue. Not that it couldn't happen, just that reports of it having happened were untrue and therefore to be discounted. I saved myself typing that much, but if you insist.
From your comment on nothing being in a service manual that has a risk, I suspect that you have never changed a tire on a split rim truck wheel. Lots more examples if you would like them.
There is a lot more to recommending transmission fluid change intervals that the manufacturer's starting point, but it is a starting point. Did you tow? Then probably sooner, if you monitor fluid temperatures and know or suspect that it was overheated. Are you concerned about a failure after changing the fluid in a high mileage transmission? Then either do it more frequently, or leave it be. If you do it more frequently, and thus greatly reduce the risk of a problem after a fluid change, is there still an economic rationale for doing it over the component life? Questionable. But start from the 100k figure? Yes. Just don't necessarily stop at that one number, if you want to maximize uptime and minimize life cycle costs.
|