![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yep, I feel it! I had to learn to drive the thing again when the 8lb flywheel was installed. Looks like the same thing again with the headers. The torque changes were very noticeable. I bet the ethanol has a role in it as well. It’s been cold, so I haven’t used the meth kit yet. That’s probably going to change the characteristics at the top end as well. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A lighter flywheel reduces torque? Pray tell how that works. |
|
Right, it doesn't. Always a good idea to review before posting. Oopsie.
What a lighter flywheel does do is decrease inertia so more torque is necessary to correct the loss of inertia to achieve better times over a a short distance. A lighter flywheel, especially on a heavy vehicle like an X5 will likely increase the amount of time to get from 0-60 feet. However, somewhere less than a quarter mile the vehicle should be faster but not always. The key to improving times over shorter distances using a light flywheel is also adding back torque to offset the lost inertia. |
What you said is only true in the moment that you are dumping a clutch. Otherwise a lighter flywheel, having less mass and therefore less linear and rotational inertia, will always contribute to faster acceleration.
|
Quote:
There are so many variables that go into realizing the benefits of a lighter flywheel it is just not a slam dunk they will be beneficial for all applications. There are also downsides that can contribute to other failures, especially if used on a daily driver. Considering all the options to go faster, and how much contribution a perfect application of a lighter flywheel can make, a lighter flywheel is way way down my list of a cost/benefit value ranking. |
Ok let’s put the small talk aside for a bit.
Today is an amazing weather day in Houston! 72 degree ambient temperature, I had the E53 completely warmed up, but not heat soaked. I activated the meth injection. I was at a cruising speed of about 46 mph, when I rev matched a downshift into 3rd gear, from 4th. From about 4400, to 6100 rpm, which put me at speed of about 88 mph, it only took 4 1/2 car lengths in total. 2 lengths past the 2 Stangs that were riling me a bit (I was about a 1/2 a car length behind), while they were cruising at about 48-49 mph. It took 3 1/2 to 4 seconds to top out at nearly 90 mph. That will be the last time I try that. 2 ton takes a noble responsibility to handle. I don’t want to be the idiot, that crashes the 2nd fastest manual E53 (the only one with power to all 4 wheels) in the world. Take it with a gain of salt. My take will be, “take it easy”. Just my two cents.. |
What do you mean by only one with power to all four wheels?
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 AM. |
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.