OT
I orbit out, and then back into this thread...
I think I am trapped back in Debate class, in HS. :rofl:
:thud:

Not positive, but pretty sure the e36's had a different ATF fluid interval. I was making sure you weren't calling on that model. Also, if your X has under 100,000 and you call a few dealers letting them know your car has under 100,000 but you want it changed anyway, I would not be surprised if some try to convince you that it was not due up yet.

That is disappointing because I am still waiting for you to explain to me how you equate "all too often" with "slight". :confused:

Once again, you have failed miserably to provide us with any proof regarding your theory, the existence of your omnipotent indy mechanic or that you actually made phone calls about your e46 to any dealers. I will now bid you adieu with something a very confused forum poster once said, "I will remind you the person making a claim has the burden of proof". :D

Hey guys....I like pie. :)

I HATE PIE! :zoom:

And here's the link that proves I'm right!

I Hate Pie!

How about rainbows, muffins, cupcakes or guns?

This subject is like debating which is better, democrat or republican...do whatever makes you feel better. I'm just trying to lighten the mood.

I hear ya'

I find these type of "which oil is best, how often should I change oil, etc" discussions to usually be interesting at first, when some data, facts, or additional views and information are posted. But inevitably, once the facts and other info runs out, they sorta lose their usefulness.

Not that I'm not guilty of similar behavior at times....

While I agree with do whatever makes you feel better I don't agree this falls along the lines of which is better. Which is better is subjective. Whether changing the ATF results in subsequent failure of the transmission is not. Either there's a correlation or there is not. And so far no correlation has been proven.

Correct.

And so far no correlation between not changing ATF and shorter transmission life has been "proven" either.

When it comes to maintenance actions, very few have actually been "proven." "Proof" is often hard to come by. I know someone who did their very first oil change on a Toyota Corolla at 25,000, which had the factory fill of non-synthetic oil, 25 years ago. Their engine was still going strong at 100,000 miles when they sold it. But that's not proof and I still think I'll change my oil more often than that and pay for synthetic oil.

So again, it's a judgment call, and people have to make it on the information they feel is important and/or the "experts" they trust.

I myself believe in changing the AFT; however, I can see the argument for not changing it, and I am open to the distinct possibility than I am wrong.

If anyone ever comes-up with some hard data that is statistically significant, I'll be very interested.

And this is why I say "Do whatever makes you feel better" instead of "You have to do it".