Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E53) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/)
-   -   Optical Illusion? (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/97636-optical-illusion.html)

dkl 07-10-2014 11:22 PM

Optical Illusion?
 
1 Attachment(s)
I've just noticed this weird optical illusion today. Ever since I've got these 285/45R19 Kumho Ecsta STXKL12, something always looked "off" about it. They have always looked to be on the "skinny" side. But not until today, did I realized how "skinny" they looked parked next to my M Coupe, which only have 255/40R18 Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position on it. To prove to myself that I haven't got the wrong tire on the X, I broke out a ruler. Sure enough, the Kumho on the X5 measured around 11 inches across while the Bridgestone on the coupe measured about 10 inches. Anyone wants to give a shot at explaining this optical illusion? :rofl:

four.8is 07-10-2014 11:55 PM

Tread pattern.they look rather narrow compared to the ones on the coupe..

romeokc10 07-11-2014 12:28 AM

I don't think they look skinny, on the other hand I'm definitely not digging those mud flaps...lol!

powers1 07-11-2014 08:19 AM

Easy to explain!M Coupe looks wider because of the lower profile tyre.
Less tyre wall makes tyre look fatter :)

motordavid 07-11-2014 09:11 AM

+1...
Tread pattern, lower profile tire on M, and the M is slightly closer to cam in the photo, and not exactly squared/head on in the side by side comparo, imo.
GL, mD

pezho405 07-11-2014 10:07 AM

The tread pattern gives this look, and i hate it, i like to buy tires with a more flatter tread at the edjes.

Your edjes are much more curved that some other tires.

M roadtser tread looks closer to 90 deg

dkl 07-11-2014 11:28 AM

1 Attachment(s)
All good explanations...thanks :thumbup:

Quote:

Originally Posted by romeokc10 (Post 1001137)
I don't think they look skinny, on the other hand I'm definitely not digging those mud flaps...lol!

I'm not digging those mud flaps either...but it keeps the rear end clean and clear of rock chips :nanana:


Quote:

Originally Posted by powers1 (Post 1001149)
Easy to explain!M Coupe looks wider because of the lower profile tyre.
Less tyre wall makes tyre look fatter

I would think the opposite as the higher profile makes the tire bulges out more and therefore should look fatter? :dunno:

In any case, my previous Pirelli Scorpion Assimetrico Zero on the X5 definitely did not look this skinny (wished I had taken a similar picture prior to swapping them out).


Quote:

Originally Posted by motordavid (Post 1001151)
+1...
Tread pattern, lower profile tire on M, and the M is slightly closer to cam in the photo, and not exactly squared/head on in the side by side comparo, imo.
GL, mD

Good catch. So...just for you, I backed up the X another 3 inches to take this picture ;)

Here's one with both cars lined up (both wheels are lined up, but the X5's tire is actually closer to the cam due to the larger tire diameter).

TiAgX5 07-11-2014 11:54 AM

Section width (285), is not contact patch width. Tires with identical section width can vary over 1" in contact patch width. Tire Rack provides the specs.

dkl 07-11-2014 12:16 PM

2 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by TiAgX5 (Post 1001161)
Section width (285), is not contact patch width. Tires with identical section width can vary over 1" in contact patch width. Tire Rack provides the specs.

Very True. But according to TireRack, the Kumho should have a tread width of approximately 1.5" wider than the Bridgestone.

four.8is 07-11-2014 12:28 PM

1 Attachment(s)
This kind of pattern makes even a skinny tire look wide
Conti vmax summer tires


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 PM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.