|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
1) That you peform regular oil analysis to make sure the oil isn't breaking down, 2) Vehicle is not operated under severe circumstances (or else drop to 15k), and 3) the oil is not used more than 1 year. Amsoil makes a good oil, but it is no better than Mobil 1. In fact there was a test run (called the space bears study on bobistheoilguy) where the guy ran the oils for about 18k miles with analysis every 1k miles. Guess what, as many have found, Amsoil thickend out of grade over time while the Mobil 1 continued to stay in grade, offer lower wear numbers, and maintain its TBN. This while being cheaper. It is hard to beat Mobil 1's R&D. |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As far as Sytnec goes: 5W-40 is actually LL-98. 0W-30 is the LL-01 approved oil as per Castrol website. One oil that I forgot about is the Mobil1 Extended Performance oil (Mobil rates it up to 15k), but can't find out if it's LL- approved. As far as M1 goes, the only ones I would use are 5W-40 and 0W-40, which do shear down to a 30wt after a decent amount of use (yes, M1 30wt oils do get quite thin). Amsoil is not a "widely available oil" because you need to get it from a dealer. People have had great results, when analyzed, with Castrol 0W-30, also fondly known as German Castrol (GC). I remember, GC used to be green at one point out of the bottle. |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My understanding is that the only Castrol 0w-30 that was LL-01 approved was the German Stuff which they stopped importing. The current 0w-30 is supposedly not LL-01. Bottom linke check the bottle. The Mobil EP oils are not LL approved. Only the 0w-40. The 0w-40 "shearing" is a bunch of crap. It started because some guy with a turbo 1.8T had a ton of fuel dilution that led to the viscosity dropping. If you follow the UOA's for the 0w-40, the only ones where is dropped out of grade are those where there was fuel dilution. |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
I read Bob'sOil stuff, too...interesting, but I tend to feel that this "oil issue" has gotten way overblown with today's level of engineering and motors.
Regular or reasonable time period filter changes, any quality name brand oil, reasonable driving habits until warmed up, etc., all seem to provide for very reduced risk of engine wear and motor longevity... I feel most of it is spec chasing/who's lab or test says what, and a Lot of marketing, both in verbage and packaging. These are not ProStock cars we are riding around in... Just my 2Cts. BR,md
__________________
Ol'UncleMotor From the Home Base of Pro Bono Punditry and 50 Cent Opins... Our Mtn Scenes, Car Pics, and Road Trip Pics on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627297418250/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627332480833/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/45275375@N00/ My X Page ![]() |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
You are correct, these aren't pro-stock cars. These are cars that have to meet emission regs, as well as be enviromentally friendly. A pro stock car gets its oil changed every race. Auto manufactures are continuing to explore longer change intervals that are friendlier for the enviroment. Also, oil temps continue to climb in newer motors, leading to sludging issues with mineral oils and necessitating synthetic oils (ala Toyota 4 cyl engines, VW 1.8T motors).
Making a race oil is easy. Load the crap out of it with AW additives and call it a day. After all, the motor won't be started when it is -20f, or have the oil in it for long periods. Making an oil that can work in eviroments from -30f to 120f+, last for 10k+ miles, minimize wear, not thicken or thin out of grade, not pollute the cat converter, and not create deposits in an engine takes a great deal of work. Manufactures create certain specs because they carefully design their motors around certain oils that balance these factors correctly for their engines. Step outside of this and you are on your own. In the USA, BMW NA has kind of screwed up, as they have varied from BMW AG's own requirements. They should be requiring and using an oil that meets the newer LL-01 spec, rather than the stuff they are using that just doesn't quite make it for the intervals they are recommending. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
cary,
I don't disagree, but this oil thing is much ado about nothing, imo. Most brands of syn are so good, the arguements are moot, I believe. GL,md
__________________
Ol'UncleMotor From the Home Base of Pro Bono Punditry and 50 Cent Opins... Our Mtn Scenes, Car Pics, and Road Trip Pics on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627297418250/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/4527537...7627332480833/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/45275375@N00/ My X Page ![]() |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Interesting to read about, just wondering how many of us have had an oil-related engine failure on a street car, in the past decade or so. We should have a new term; us motor-heads can hang together and the oil-heads can line up on the other side of the room. Cary, welcome to X5 world in any case, good to have you here Jeff
__________________
2007 X3 3.0si, 6 MT, Premium, White Retired: 2008 535i, 6 MT, M Sport, Premium, Space Grey 2003 X5 3.0 Steptronic, Premium, Titanium Silver 2002 325xi 5 MT, Steel Grey 2004 Z4 3.0 Premium, Sport, SMG, Maldives Blue |
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
My mechanic has noted that in clients BMW's (they are a independing BMW repair shop) that have followed the 15k interval on the factory Synth that the motors have very noisy valvetrains by 100k and some have had to have the heads rebuilt due to excessive valve guide and drivetrain wear. On the motors that have had an intermediate oil change at about 7500 miles (their recommendatioin), he says they are as tight as a drum. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|