|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
2006 X5 4.4i Sport package, summer package, cold weather package, DSP + Nav Bought 2/14 with 73k miles |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I made no comment on the business practices of the seller (however I did mention there were issues...such as the misleading mileage). My response was focused on the un/reliability of the vehicle being sold. |
|
#63
|
||||
|
||||
|
A little reality check on total loss/rebuild vehicles.
These vehicles attain total loss status when most competent repair facilities cannot repair damage without exceeding value of vehicle. These shops have high shop rates, partly due to 100s of thousands of dollars invested in equipment to fix vehicles correctly. Most vehicles that go from total loss to rebuilt title are done in shops with low overhead, limited equipment, and a STRICT eye on the bottom line. A minimum of new parts, cheap China parts and corner cutting are the norm (a build it back just good enough to look nice and sell mentality). While there are good "rebuilt" vehicles on the market, they are the exception, not the rule. I'm sure if you asked the seller to split the cost of a real BMW PPI, he would show you the door.
__________________
'03 X5 4.4 Sport, last of the M62s (8-03 build date) I believe in deadication to craftmanship in a world of mediocrity! |
|
#64
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know. I should have made that clearer in my response. You were solely referring to the potential reliability. However, as Tiag pointed out, that would be the exception rather than the rule due to the reasons he stated.
__________________
2005 X5 4.4i Build 04/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, Pano, Sport (Purchased 06/14 w/ 109,000 miles) (Sold 8/15 w/121,000 miles) 2006 X5 4.8is Build 11/05 Maintenance/Build Log Nav, DSP, Pano, Running Boards, OEM Tow Hitch, Cold Weather Pckg (Purchased 08/15 w/ 90,500 miles) 2010 X5 35d Build 02/10 Nav, HiFi, 6 DVD, Sports Pckg, Cold Weather Pckg, HUD, CAS, Running Boards, Leather Dash, PDC, Pano (Purchased 03/17 w/ 136,120 miles) |
|
#65
|
||||
|
||||
|
I might go take a look this weekend. If I do, I'll report back. Could be fun. I used to sell cars back in the day. (not a typical d-bag salesman)
__________________
|
|
#66
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'd like to hear his response. I know it was brought up earlier, but the false miles is just not sitting well with me. It's like third world shit. I should call and have a chat, but what good would that do? Nothing. Or maybe I could get them to change their add? |
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There are a lot of people out there who want the BMW badge and will buy one you or I wouldn't touch. They won't care if it has the correct instrument cluster. Or they don't care about the mileage (or if the mileage indicated in accurate). They want a BMW and if this is priced right (which it doesn't appear to be) they'll buy it. |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Whoever buys this vehicle most likely isn't going to care about these things. They're going to see it as a vehicle they'd like to drive. The fact the mileage is incorrect most likely won't matter (I know here in Colorado I don't even think you need to do a mileage disclosure once a vehicle is over 10 years old). Is the dealer being dishonest...I think so given there are a number of indicators that the mileage is in error (there's a huge red flag on the Carfax screaming out at you to this effect). Hopefully whoever buys this at least reviews the Carfax so they'll see it). But there are potential buyers who genuinely do not care. That's the target buyer for this vehicle. |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#70
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
. Your rightI'm just too honest. I base my life around honesty. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|