|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
Current stable: 2005 LMB X5 4.8is, 2000 LMB M5, 2004 JB M3 6spd coupe |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks, that’s what I’m thinking and my money is on the alignment. It only shows these symptoms when the ride height changes so drastically (bags deflated previously, and coilovers installed now). Tires would have shown symptoms regardless, and I’d like to think the bushings would have as well.
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Late update for anyone who may search the issue. The ball joints in my rear upper control arms (all 4 arms) were bad causing excessive play, and a very bad alignment to top it off. The back end was dangerously unstable, a bump in the road and I could jump over a foot. New arms and an alignment and all is good!
|
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Knock on wood I should be done with everything tonight after a replacement front driver's axle arrives. I removed the rear airbags and plugged the rubber cap with a nut/bolt with a washer under either side. The washers squeeze onto the rubber in the cap and seal off the hole. I have the coilovers on full soft for the time being and will adjust ride height to be comparable to where it was OEM (I measured 31.5" ground to wheel arch height on average all around). I may lower it a tad, but likely not much more than an inch or so if I do as it's an SUV and slamming it would ruin the utility. I'll report back my opinion on the ride quality, but I doubt that I'll get true feedback until it's aligned as every suspension component was replaced so it's guaranteed to be totally out of spec.
__________________
Current stable: 2005 LMB X5 4.8is, 2000 LMB M5, 2004 JB M3 6spd coupe |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
And she's back together. I gotta say the ride quality is surprisingly good, not in any way harsh almost stock on the softest setting. Can't wait to get it aligned and play with it a bit
__________________
Current stable: 2005 LMB X5 4.8is, 2000 LMB M5, 2004 JB M3 6spd coupe Last edited by 16g-95gsx; 03-16-2017 at 08:42 AM. |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
After driving it with a proper alignment I am fairly impressed how much tighter the truck is with no adverse harshness on the softest damper setting. On the firmest (32 way adjustable) it is noticeably firmer but I still would say it's about as harsh as most oem truck suspensions. Very impressed and glad that I made the switch, having been skeptical at first I would highly recommend the swap to others.
__________________
Current stable: 2005 LMB X5 4.8is, 2000 LMB M5, 2004 JB M3 6spd coupe |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
On the E39, this made the big sedan move around like an E46. Yes, they're *supposed* to be 50/50 from the factory, but we all know those big ole 315's are heavier than the fronts. And there is no way they accounted for a driver. On my E39 in particular, they didn't plan on a huge aluminum radiator (with twice the fluid weight) and a big ole supercharger up front. On my E53, I could balance out the heavy under ride protection up front. But I wont. I like and I have used the ability to raise and lower the suspension enough that I will keep it. For the 'stance' crowd, this will upset the perfectly even height at all four corners. For the 'coil overs is for slammed' crowd.. well.. you can have a lower ride height that is also balanced. But the key for coils is balance- not looks. The performance reward is totally worth the little bit of 'off-balance' look.
__________________
|
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You will not be able to change the front/rear balance or the left/right balance. Those are determined by the location of the center of mass (OK, slightly adjustable if you purposely tilt the car forward, for example). You will be able to make them balanced though, within the constraints of not changing front/rear and left/right. So ..........15..........35 <<== ..........35..........15 with F/R = 50/50 and L/R = 50/50 can be balanced to ..........25..........25 <<== ..........25..........25 There is no change in F/R and L/R, since that would require a special waiver from the laws of physics and those are not being given out right now ;-). When you dialed in 25/25/25/25, this is what was being adjusted, giving a great improvement in handling. If you got to 25/25/25/25, you must have started with 50/50 F/R and 50/50 L/R, since that's what you ended with and the mass properties did not change. But I could adjust my 911's torsion bars all day long and not change the 41/59 F/R weight distribution, even if I wanted to.
__________________
2001 X5 3.0i, 203k miles, AT, owned since 2014 |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Thanks for alll that!
__________________
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|