Quote:
|
Originally Posted by panzercommander
in my case it's a comparison issue. my 94 e36 (164,000 miles) has had FAR less issues then my 2004 X. the 2000 e39 i sold had 129,ooo miles on it and also had very few issues . as has been stated, i like the x5 but it doesn't meet my standard on bmw relability and design. after decades of bmw ownership i am disappointed in my bmw X5 and i would not buy another one or reccomend buying one to anyone else.
|
Your e36 & e39 are much less complicated than the X5, therefore less issues. For example, neither your e36 nor e39 (assuming non-xi) have all-wheel-drive, therefore, you won't have front CV boot/joint issues. Those also lack the T-case and front diff...so these cannot break on your e36 & e39. The windows are larger and heavier on the X5 than on the e36 & e39, therefore, window regulators would go south faster on the X5 (I do agree that BMW should have beefed up their regulators to account for the additional weight). But my point is that you're not comparing apples to apples. Anytimes you have more mechanical hardware, things are bound to break and be less reliable than those absent of those mechanical components.
Waterpumps, brakes, cv boots...all seems to be normal wear and tear items on something that's close to 100k. All of my cars, I wouldn't let them go past 90k without overhauling their cooling system (replacing waterpump, T-Stats, hoses, etc...)