|
||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
'08 X5 3.0si - Alpine White / Saddle Brown interior Specs: Sport Pkg, Premium Pkg, Tech Pkg, Comfort Access, Aero Kit, Style 433 staggered 20s on Conti DWS Mods: Carbon 35 tint, LED angel eyes, GP Thunder 7500k fogs, H&R 20mm/25mm spacers, clear reflectors, gunsmoke-tinted taillights Coded: Digital speedo, windows/sunroof/tailgate close via keyfob X5 pics at Flickr |
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Sat in both last night. First I briefly sat in the perforated nevada comfort seat (car not powered on yet so no AVS). Then I briefly sat in the napa comfort. The napa was WAY softer and "nicer" to the touch. In this brief test I didn't notice much of a difference in their overall comfort level. It seemed muich more of an appearance difference. But it was very brief as I was eager to test drive the one with AVS since that is the one that is otherwise equipped as I want.
I then went on a test drive with the AVS and found them very nice and sufficient, but after thinking about it more (while on the test drive) I am still unsure. The AVS feature seems nice, but very subtle...really hard to tell how much I am going to appreciate the AVS features. It sounds like I will from those who have them...maybe it just takes time to notice how wonderful they are. I do like the fact that they are perforated and can "breathe". The nevada leather, while more rugged and probably much more durable, still feels somewhat cheap in comparison to the napa to me. The napa seemed much more elegant and cushier (but maybe this "cushiness" was because the one with napa had been broken in...it was an 07 CPO with low mileage). I know this is a BMW and not a Mercedes (thus sportier and firmer seats), but it should still feel and look like the $70k car that it is. I am probably overanalyzing this. They are both nice...but at a car at this price point and the fact that I do make long drives reasonably often, I want to make sure comfort is optimal. Do the seats (with nevada in particular) break in and become less firm over time? Is it likely that was the difference in comfort levels as opposed to the grade of leather? |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Active Ventilated Comfort seats option is the one I enjoy the most. I would never buy a BMW without this option again.
The active part is OK, but the ventilated feature makes a hugh difference on a hot day. As others have stated, the air flow is subtle, but is enough to keep you dry. It does not blow as hard as my wife's IS-350, but it does do the job well. As far the the comfort adjustment features, there is not a better seat on the market IMO - except of course, the rear seat in a Maybach.
__________________
Carpe Diem |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
it makes a big difference on longer trips too.
__________________
2013 X5 35i M Sport |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|