Much like the ACLU and other acronym bias organizations, the NAACP..for whatever reason it feels it has some role..is saying the NFL shouldn't ban Michael Vick (yeah..the FELON who bet on dog fighting)

The real question is, would they give 2 sh_ts if it was Peyton Manning, instead of Michael Vick?

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/08/22/vick/index.html
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2986382

Just a few of their AMAZING quotes:

A few more amazing lines:

On Monday, New York Knicks guard Stephon Marbury was in Albany, N.Y., promoting his brand of affordable sneakers. He was asked about Michael Vick, and said, according to Newsday:

"We don't say anything about people shooting deers and shooting other animals, you know what I mean? From what I hear, dogfighting is a sport. It's just behind closed doors and I think it's tough that we build Michael Vick up and then we break him down ... I think he fell into a bad situation."

__________________

An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting.

"promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare"

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.