MLB 'roid list is out - Page 5

toohotdoc · #41 12-14-2007, 03:18 PM

A-Rod not on the list, finally a reason for him to make 275 million. lol

Sponsored Links

Quicksilver · #42 12-14-2007, 03:50 PM

I aint got nothing to do with it, but i believe the fella's right.....

Someone said (and I agree) All this report tells us is that water is wet

Quote:

Originally Posted by SANguru

in the grand scheme of things though, there are soldiers dying in iraq, there are kids starving around the world, there are droughts that are getting worst, and of course global freakin warming...

and we're worred about a bunch of ball players taking performance enhancing or regeneration "drugs" which are against the rules but hardly against the law AND on top of this they paid George Mitchell $2 million a month for the investigation when this $$ could have gone to a much better use???

THIS IS ONE STUPID SOCIETY.

Fine them or suspend them.... and after that, in the wise words of Gresch, CARRY ON.

nupe10123 · #43 12-14-2007, 03:51 PM

Mitchell has stated that the list is not complete, he only added the easiest targets where there was enough to avoid a slander/liable suit, but not necessarily enough to get any kind of 'legal' proof.

IMHO, roids really help pitchers more than any other position, they also help with recovery from injuries etc. I don't believe they have much effect on hitting and fielding ability. I do believe that Bonds could have broken the homerun record with or without roids (I don't know if he used them or not). I think it's likely that if he used them, he only got a handfull of extra homeruns of hits that otherwise would have hit the top of the wall or warning track. The roids would not help him make contact with the ball.

My real issue with the list is releasing the names. I do believe many players used/use roids and HGH, but not necessarily all of the ones named and most certainly additional ones. If a player if proven to use, then they should be called out, but why ruin a reputation or image without legal evidence?

SANguru · #44 12-14-2007, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wagner

Also includes players they had physical evidence on.

LOL.. that reminds me of that recent story where some dude downed a bottle of vodka because he cound't get pass security with it and almost died.. haha....

SANguru · #45 12-14-2007, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by primetime

This is a dead issue..if you read everything you would see that...get a grip buddy..and your resume doesn't impress me...

And for the record, I wasn't the one who started slamming Alex Rodriguez and crying he didn't make the list..I was simply stating he is an excellent ball player and deserves respect for his skills and ability as a ball player..You don't have to like his personality or whatever he does outside the ballpark, that's your preference...

why don't you just say it out right and not beat around the bush (no pun intended) that you got a big ass schlong and it's bigger than his... and since when is a medical degree big time??? LOL

primetime · #46 12-14-2007, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SANguru

why don't you just say it out right and not beat around the bush (no pun intended) that you got a big ass schlong and it's bigger than his... and since when is a medical degree big time??? LOL

LMAO! Well..he's had a 20 year head start on me..he better be doing well....

Boston X5 4.4 · #47 12-14-2007, 05:42 PM

This is just the first rattle of the tree - a few more juice monkeys will fall out before all this is done.

Agree, its like finding out that the water is wet and there are far more issues out there more deserving of the cash spent on Mitchell.