Gun Topic/Debate

Ricky Bobby · #11 04-18-2016, 11:40 AM

^I am also outraged about that - still steaming about it too.

Did you also hear about Thrillary's "25% gun tax?"
I cannot stand most all of Bernie's policies or free stuff mantra, but he does make it quite clear that Vermont having constitutional carry and the most constitutional gun laws (i.e. not many) in the nation has nothing to do with gun violence as a whole - he also voted against the frivolous suits previously, but I'm sure in an election year he will start to retract that message and start to go over to the Bloomberg/Clinton side

Honestly the only thing something like that is doing is driving more sales. When I read that article I contacted my FFL and told them I'll definitely be purchasing an AR-15 this year, most likely the Ruger AR-556 or the Colt Expanse M4

Yes lets allow lawsuits for a criminals actions against a manufacturer of a gun - probably the most idiotic thing I've ever heard - The Sandy Hook families really just want to get paid at any cost don't they? Considering half the Lanza's are dead and most likely bankrupted a month after the murders, I don't know what's more astonishing, the thought of suing a manufacturer of a product that worked as intended and without defect, or the fact that this many years later these parents are so driven to get paid at any cost that all principles are out the window?

Did the Colorado shooter victims also sue the maker of the guns used? Did the Ft Hood shooters victims families also sue the maker of the weapons used? Did the San Bernadino victims families also go on a money hunt from gun makers?

Something is seriously wrong up there in Connecticut, I am seriously getting as far away from this DC-Boston metropolis hell hole of progressive thought very soon.