Quote:
Originally Posted by edogg
Next time someone is injured in a car accident, they should sue the auto manufacturer. And if they're hit by a drunk driver, they should sue the company who made the alcohol. Because it's the company's fault that someone misused the item which they manufacture, right?
ETA: I'm being sarcastic, in case that isn't clear...
|
^Quite crystal clear and I've said both already to numerous people - there is NO difference! Gun shop owners are supposed to use judgement as well in addition to a NICS check at point of sale
Adam Lanza STOLE his MOTHER'S gun and she was a lawful owner, do people understand the precedent? He was a CRIMINAL by stealing that gun and committing murder with it.
So a criminal gangbanger shoots down a young boy in a neighborhood, since a CRIMINAL committed murder with a gun, all those victims families are now able to sue the manufacturer of a gun because it was used in a felony?
If you're speeding down a road and kill someone on a hit and run, I guess that victims family should sue the maker of your car?
04-18-2016, 01:01 PM
Hybrid Mode
