Home Forums Articles How To's FAQ Register
Go Back   Xoutpost.com > Off-topic > The Lounge
Arnott
User Name
Password
Member List Premier Membership Today's Posts New Posts

Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring....
Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 04-07-2017, 03:44 PM
Ricky Bobby's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 9,344
Ricky Bobby will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by crystalworks View Post
Making you cover the weapon is in no way infringing on the second amendment.
Joseph - I can respect your viewpoints on everything, doesn't necessarily mean I agree but I can respect it, probably helps that you are in TX and not speaking to me from the utopia of NYC or San Fran -

However I had to highlight that line in bold - the problem with that statement is once you start with "well the government will make you cover the firearm because its not allowed", then leads to "well the government thinks that you need a lot of training to qualify for this concealed carry license", followed by "there is too much danger to the public to have people carrying firearms, if you believe that you should carry a firearm you have to prove justifiable need to do so in front of a judge", which is what we have in NJ - and along the way, all you will hear is "xxx provision in no way infringes on the 2nd Amendment"

There was a large case lost in one of the circuits of appeals a couple years back from NJ which the guy was challenging the no-issue/justifiable need in our state and the appeals court upheld the lower court ruling which was that it "in no way infringed on the 2nd Amendment or Heller or McDonald cases" - Basically that ruling has kept NJ from getting its carry rights back as the anti-gun majority in the legislature would never pass a resolution removing "justifiable need" - there was something our governor did recently trying to add the words "serious threats" to the definition of justifiable need, technically giving a bit more lee-way in the possibility of a private citizen obtaining a carry permit and that tiny measure was stopped so fast by the legislature you couldn't even blink.


So that line does bite me a bit raw personally as I think its a slippery slope, again, I am changing my situation for the better and thank you for your well wishes, but in our state of 9 million plus people and living here my whole life, I realize how much of a bubble we the people have been grouped into, and there is a ton of crime in our inner cities.

But yes we don't have to agree on everything and its nice to share opinions even though they may not match.
__________________
2018 Ram 2500 6.7L Cummins 68RFE
19k miles -Bright White/Black - Big Horn Sport - Crew Cab Short Bed
2013 X5 35D (CEO's) - Born on 5/17/2013 -
82k miles - Alpine White/Cinnamon Brown/Premium Pkg, Sport Activity/Premium Pkg and Sound/20" Style 214/Running Boards

Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.
vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved. Xoutpost.com is a private enthusiast site not associated with BMW AG.
The BMW name, marks, M stripe logo, and Roundel logo as well as X3, X5 and X6 designations used in the pages of this Web Site are the property of BMW AG.
This web site is not sponsored or affiliated in any way with BMW AG or any of its subsidiaries.