What, you want to see my papers now? No, I don't justify myself to you or anyone else.

But I will say, in keeping to the subject...

What I presented are "off the top of my head" suggestions. They might work, they might need further work, or they might need a third party to modify them and come up with a better angle - including how to deal with gangs. But at least they are ideas. You can dismiss them if you like as unreal, but that just goes to show AGAIN that you have a limited thought on this subject. The only solution you seem to promote is MORE GUNS. I am against that.

Brownshirts? I think I see now why it is that you like this fellow who rants uncontrollably.

Oh no, I'm not dismissing your ideas as unreal...it just goes to show how much you must love big govt. Let's bring them into every facet of our lives...that should make for a much better world, huh?

You just seem to be a contradiction from what you think off the "top of your head" and your signature. But, I'm the one that's got the problem?! OK, if you say so...;)

Yes, IMO, you make too many assumptions and don't take the time to think about anything or make coherent and apropos points.

What makes you think I am in anyway in favor of big government? Was it because I listed points that I would take to deal with the gun issue? Did you forget that I made those points - not because I believe in big G, but because you ASKED me what my ideas for curbing gun violence were? Don't you understand what ideas "off the top of the head" mean, or have you never been required in your life to THINK about things and make suggestions?

Does expanding one segment of rules mean that we can't contract others? BTW, what is it you want ? Cities with 5 million people in them and no rules? How long do you think that society will last? Or is it just that we need to have only the rules that you favor?

And what about anything I have posted is in contradiction to my sig? To what was I referring when I wrote that sig? What is it's context? What is it's meaning? How does wanting to regulate and tax and keeping weapons out of the hands of nutjobs contradict with my sig? You haven't a clue have you?

Like so many things that you don't know you just fill in the blanks with whatever is floating in your head and start arguing from your own imaginary points, not about anything that was actually said.

It seemed to me that Piers was having a reasonable discussion - as I said - minus the name calling. The other guy just rants without any point other than "I want." "I want." "I want." With no other substance - you do remember that my comment was about the videos and not about the constitution - or are you too deep into your own talking points?

You know when I think about all the people in this world who definitely should not have a gun, both you and this Alex Jones certainly jump to the top of the list now. I believe there should be some standard of ability to reason and debate without straying from facts and reality in order to own a gun. Seems to me you both fail when it come to that test.

I will say this...as this is MY THREAD...and was ORIGINALLY about Gerald Celente and not Alex Jones...the only reason I find your thoughts contradictory is because you are limiting peoples RIGHTS with your thoughts about creating limitations on gun ownership. I find you to be quite judgmental for someone that wants to protect "Rights" above all else...not even trade them for "magic beans":rofl:

Again, no mention of real issues facing citizens of the USA...gangs, abortions, pharmaceuticals, suicide, knives, hammers, clubs, etc. It's just guns...I just find it odd that it's just guns that outrage you to the point that you're looking to pick a fight on a thread that wasn't even about GUNS.:bustingup And, I'm the one with the problem?:rolleyes:

Why did you decide to post your diatribe on this thread??? Why not the one that was about "Gun Control"? Seems odd to me. Well, maybe not if I'm correct that you're looking for a fight and needed to throw your ad hominems directly at me. What did I piss you off in another thread? Did I somehow make you feel insecure about yourself? Again, why this thread?

I think it's pretty clear that you are not from the REPUBLIC:bustingup You must have some other form of tyranny that you're concerned about. Your signature doesn't jive with what a PATRIOT of the REPUBLIC would stand for with regards to protecting peoples "Rights". I ASSUMED that you might have been a PATRIOT of the REPUBLIC...that's obviously NOT the case.;) You're the person from "various":bustingup

But seriously, best wishes in your life and may you and your loved ones be kept safe from harm...and I'm not being sarcastic. In the end, most of us are just humans that were made in Gods image trying to figure out what all this means and how to protect our loved ones from tyrannical/evil forces that would prefer to enslave us.

Now, go ahead and tell me what a bad person I am and how I shouldn't own a gun.:bustingup

(2) Where in the constitution does it declare unlimited rights to arms? I have not studied the big 'C', but believe it say something about a "well regulated" militia. But even more I think a persons right to life trumps another persons "right" to the means of mass murder. (3)Judgmental? OK. I have an opinion and I have expressed it.

(1)As to why I commented in this thread, Yes, this thread started with you promoting Gerald Celente. I commented that it was non-sense. YOU then switched to state that you actually favored Alex Jones. I later came across an Alex Jones rant and commented on that. If you don't want people's opinions maybe you shouldn't start threads. My DIATRIBE (4)as you so wrongly use the word wasn't at all, it was a critique of someone YOU mentioned in your thread.

(5)I commented earlier in this thread that this guy was "Paranoia. And rambling nonsense." There was no theme to this thread other than his nonsensical rambling - at least that is where it started. If you want to have a discussion about other issues, then I think you should post them and see who responds. If it is one huge mish-mash of everything some paranoid wants to mention in a video, then I have no interest.

Why did I bring up guns and try to pick a fight on that one issue? My insecurity about myself? I am not from the REPUBLIC!

CAN YOU HEAR YOURSELF?

(6)Again, read what you wrote. I got onto the subject of guns while commenting on the contents of the videos posted by both you and I. YOU THEN WANTED TO KNOW HOW I WOULD HANDLE THE GUN ISSUE - I responded to your question. And this whole thing about the republic - wow!

I think you should go back and read this thread from top to bottom. Maybe you will see what was really being discussed and at what times.

I am not sure what to say to you at this point. You have no consistency of thought, you are like that Celente fellow rambling from one paranoid subject to another. You bring up issues and then get upset at others for disagreeing or "trying to start a fight."

I don't think you are a bad person - maybe confused. I am sorry if this thread got you bent out of shape. If you prefer, I will be happy to drop it.

I just want to know how controlling hammer ownership is going to reduce mass murders.

And I am waiting for a comment from the OP on Alex Jones and why alternative news sources have started to delisted him for, as they say, presenting ideas "that are buried under so many wild claims, tabloid style rhetoric, fear-mongering, and misleading conclusions that sifting the valid points from the misinformation would take more time than most folks have the patience for."

Upon reflection, I can understand why perhaps that style would appeal to the OP.

Boo hooo. Mean ole A.J. is just too brash for the TRULY DOMESTICATED types.:bustingup

Google DEMOCIDE...it's gone parabolic:thumbup:

I'd say, mission accomplished...but to the TRULY DOMESTICATED...it was harsh to see him hold court on a BS cable show.

CNN...so fake, you'd almost believe it's real! :bustingup

WTF? I leave you to your own devices.

Really...Fuck Off! I wasn't even talking to you.

Now, back on track: