Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E53) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/)
-   -   how fast is it? (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/16690-how-fast.html)

Ecko 09-05-2006 08:39 AM

Um, um um.......
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by benathon
How do you know for a fact that it's less than 7.5???

Um, because I floor the peddle and know what 7.5sec feels like:nanana: By then I know I'm doing more than 60mph:thumbup: I haven't had the chance to drive it too much since I got her but I'll be taken her down to ATL motor speedway in the weeks to come. I'll report back official results of the 01 0-60 times;)

Ajogu 09-05-2006 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ecko
Um, because I floor the peddle and know what 7.5sec feels like:nanana: By then I know I'm doing more that 60mph:thumbup: I haven't had the chance to drive it too much since I got her but I'll be taken her down to ATL motor speedway in the weeks to come. I'll report back official results of the 01 0-60 times;)

You're trying to say that you "feel" the difference between 7 seconds and 7.5 seconds:confused:
Two of us on this thread have said that our post 04 4.4 X5's beat the pre 04 models.
Looks like you'll have to find yourself a post 04 4.4 to race to find out the truth about which is faster;)

drs 09-05-2006 04:00 PM

The 2003 4.4 engine specifications listed in my owners manual are……

290 HP @5400RPM
324 Maximum torque ft/lbs @ 3600RPM


drs

timbo126 09-05-2006 09:33 PM

A dinan performance chip will help all the valvetronic models out a great deal. The throttle response with a dinan chip is comparable to an M car. Then the pre 04 4.4 wouldn't stand a chance.

Tomaz 09-05-2006 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timbo126
A dinan performance chip will help all the valvetronic models out a great deal. The throttle response with a dinan chip is comparable to an M car. Then the pre 04 4.4 wouldn't stand a chance.

Uh, which M car were you thinking?

Ecko 09-05-2006 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajogu
You're trying to say that you "feel" the difference between 7 seconds and 7.5 seconds:confused:
Two of us on this thread have said that our post 04 4.4 X5's beat the pre 04 models.
Looks like you'll have to find yourself a post 04 4.4 to race to find out the truth about which is faster;)

Guess I can't be sarcastic up N here with the post 04 4.4i guys:rolleyes: Taken offense ehh? J/K. Anyhow, I'm not saying the 01's are any faster than the 04's but com'on you and I both know what 7.5 sec's feels like. Who needs a stop watch to tell em that?:rolleyes: I haven't gotten official times/results yet but in the weeks to come hopefully I will. But on the real, I could give a rats ass on the 0-60 times the 4.4i X5 is doing. It feels, and looks fast therefore I'm content with all that. Nuf said:nanana:

DINANM3 09-06-2006 02:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ecko
Guess I can't be sarcastic up N here with the post 04 4.4i guys:rolleyes: Taken offense ehh? J/K. Anyhow, I'm not saying the 01's are any faster than the 04's but com'on you and I both know what 7.5 sec's feels like. Who needs a stop watch to tell em that?:rolleyes: I haven't gotten official times/results yet but in the weeks to come hopefully I will. But on the real, I could give a rats ass on the 0-60 times the 4.4i X5 is doing. It feels, and looks fast therefore I'm content with all that. Nuf said:nanana:

as far as my G tech pro is concerned. the best time i ever ran 0to60 in my 2004 4.4 was 6.779 so i will call it 6.8sec. Which is about right.The g tech is very accurate to the tenth i verified this at the track against my time slips. It was off a tenth at the most. and no one knows what 7.5 sec quarter mile feels like. If you did 2 runs and on was 7sec and the other was 7.5 i dought you would even feel it


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45 AM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.