Xoutpost.com

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E53) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/)
-   -   how fast is it? (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e53-forum/16690-how-fast.html)

jst2878 06-16-2006 02:18 PM

how fast is it?
 
I heard that the 2001 x5 is the fasted 4.4 out there. 15.1 in the quarter mile isn't half bad. what is the Q/M time on the 4.6?

alexz 06-16-2006 06:10 PM

not sure about 1/4 mile times, but my old 2003 X5 4.4 with sport was able to do 0-60 in 6.8 sec

Wagner 06-16-2006 06:29 PM

Well the current 2004+ 4.4 gets a 15.1 quarter....so I guess not much has changed.
http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/Sp...l=X5&trimid=-1

asawadude 06-16-2006 06:39 PM

Are we talking real world times or BMW published times? dragslips.com should have some actual 1/4 mile times posted.

CanadianX5 06-16-2006 06:57 PM

I have a 2001 4.4 Sport and its fast. From a standing start I stayed ahead of my buddy driving a 2006 FX45.
I'm not to sure of times though.

Was well worth trading in my old 1999 4.0 cherokee.:thumbup:

Aimster 06-16-2006 07:45 PM

how fast is the 2001 3.0?

I would have to say 16.5

It is pretty identical to my mom's 2006 highlander in terms of speed and my old 01 maxima.

BIMMER DUDEE 06-20-2006 10:45 PM

Great question, I have a 4.4i 2001 X5, my buddy did the 0-60 check and we came out with 6.8 also, to be honest it was at 6.789 sec. I'm guessing that the reason why the times are so close together is if you look at the weight on the 01 and any other X5 the 01 weighes a little less then compared to an 04-06... Checked it out with my buddy... So it could be a possibility about the 01 being the fastest 4.4i... Now with the 4.6 or the 4.8, I would have to say the 4.8...but 4.6 not really that far off...

cmyX6go 06-21-2006 04:37 AM

OK I'm confused. My '01 had 282hp, '05 has what 315hp. So why/how is the '01 faster? Torque. (girlie question).

Wagner 06-21-2006 05:32 AM

Probably the torque and the gearing, but if you look at the BMW times the X5 from 2001 is no faster then the 4.4 valvetronic....

plus the valvetronic has better MPG, so you have the best of both worlds. :)

cimbro 06-21-2006 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WagnerX5
Probably the torque and the gearing, but if you look at the BMW times the X5 from 2001 is no faster then the 4.4 valvetronic....

plus the valvetronic has better MPG, so you have the best of both worlds. :)

I also have the same sensation. The older 4.4 amazing! The facelift seems to be underpowered. It should be the valvetronic effect, speed progressive and not all the power starting from 0


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:54 PM.

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.