| Penguin |
06-13-2008 03:08 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by deutsch100
A-ha, one knows never to trust Consumer Reports for cars. They are only useful for washers and toaster ovens. Anyone with the slightest bit of car knowledge and insight, knows that Consumer Reports is basically just a bitch to sell Camrys, Accords and Civics. I don't even consider Consumer Reports an option for car reviews, unless the car is from Japan, and under $25k (and then, that wouldn't be a car in my eyes ;). That's just the plain truth.
|
CR is very biased when it comes to their verbage, but their reliability data is quite accurate and compiled mechanically, with no personal bias inserted into the results.
If you check with experienced mechanics who work on the vehicles, they will confirm that the CR reliability data is quite accurate, e.g., when it shows 2001 Ford Focus's had engine issues, Ford mechanics will confirm it.
Check out their past data on BMW problem areas and compare with what you see posted as to problem areas -- you will find a close match.
The CR reliability data is quite good, and That's a fact, whether or not you like the answer.
P.S. Here's one example. The CR reliability data for the Z4 shows the fuel system as below average reliability for 2003 models, but above average for 2004. Guess what? BMW did a recall on all 2003 models to fix a vapor lock problem because owners were reporting engine stalling at at high ambient temepratures/altitudes.
|