|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Xoutpost server transfer and maintenance is occurring.... |
| Xoutpost is currently undergoing a planned server migration.... stay tuned for new developments.... sincerely, the management |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
05-22-2008, 03:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
1) It's Religious context. 2) It's State/Contract context. If we were living in a society where marriage was only an institution recognized by Religion. I might entirely agree, depending on your Religion. But, since MARRIAGE is an institution of Government with Contracts, Divorce, Benefits, etc. and Marriage is also recognized as an institution for people who do not believe, practice Religion at all. Then putting a value system on it that only recognizes it's religious significance, is to discredit all the non-religious conventions of the practice.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------  "When two people agree on everything, one of them is not necessary" - Arliss Last edited by B-Line; 05-22-2008 at 05:33 PM. 
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
|
#12
05-22-2008, 03:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
 In what sense is this correct?Quote:
__________________
"What you hear in a great jazz band is the sound of democracy. “The jazz band works best when participation is shaped by intelligent communication.” Harmony happens whenever different parts get to form a whole by means of congruity, concord, symetry, consistency, conformity, correspondence, agreement, accord, unity, consonance……. 
|
|
#13
05-22-2008, 04:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
 I don't understand either.terI think Government and State messed it all up when they used "marriage" m for a non religous union. Simply what I mean is that they could have given it a different name, but the exact same benefits, and ramifications (of divorce). Recognize a religious groups "Marriage" and 2 individuals with no religion to have a "civil union" or whatever you decide to call it. Maybe all the people who object to this sort of thing (as the ppl given the option above) can not disagree to 2 people deciding to spend the rest of their life together, as well as getting the benefits of those who are in a religious union.
__________________
-- 2005 LeMans Blue e53 4.8is MODs ///LeMans Blue RBs///Intravee II///Sirius///ACS Spoiler///AiB v3///HID Fogs///LED Tails/// ///215 20" Ferric Gray///MTEC Pedals///DVD Headrests///SMG M Wheel///AFE CAI Stage 2    
|
|
#14
05-22-2008, 04:10 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gee, wonder how long the Government has been hand in hand with religion?
__________________
An unwavering defender of those I see worth protecting. "promote the general welfare, not provide the general welfare" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
|
|
#15
05-22-2008, 04:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Since the beginning of time. But what I mean is that if you want to seperate the difference (and only in the case of marriage which doesnt make sense) - then you have to change the name marriage.
I personally think marriage is a religious thing, if someone with no religion wants to get "married" - maybe they should have another name for it.
__________________
-- 2005 LeMans Blue e53 4.8is MODs ///LeMans Blue RBs///Intravee II///Sirius///ACS Spoiler///AiB v3///HID Fogs///LED Tails/// ///215 20" Ferric Gray///MTEC Pedals///DVD Headrests///SMG M Wheel///AFE CAI Stage 2
|
|
#16
05-22-2008, 04:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------- "When two people agree on everything, one of them is not necessary" - Arliss
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
