What's the matter with Donald Trump.

[EODguy]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...9/#__sec5title

Original article and NOT some "fact checkers" write up as if was gospel....

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk

[bcredliner]

Originally Posted by EODguy

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...9/#__sec5title

Original article and NOT some "fact checkers" write up as if was gospel....

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk

Posting a link to the original article means nothing. The claims of the original article are what has been debunked.

In the face of three reputable fact checkers that have studied the article and listed all the false claims-- you choose to ignore them and respond with a link to the original article as if posting it endorses your post. It is the exact article that was fact checked and debunked. Please explain why you think posting the original article is meaningful.

[EODguy]

I posted to a respected peer reviewed scientific journal yet the random fact checker is who you believed?

I guess you don't recall telling pretty much everyone that links we provided weren't good enough as the AGGREGATOR websites were not trustworthy in your opinion, so now you think some liberal newspaper overrides an actual scientific journal.

Unfucking believable.

It does actually say that chloroquine stopped transmission of SARs Coronavirus and pretty much killed it off in the original host, doesn't it?

You go ahead believe USA Today, since that is the most respected bastion of science in the USA.



Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk

[bcredliner]

Originally Posted by EODguy

I posted to a respected peer reviewed scientific journal yet the random fact checker is who you believed?There is no challenge to the study as it was intended. However, the procedure and the virus are not applicable to COVID-19.

I guess you don't recall telling pretty much everyone that links we provided weren't good enough as the AGGREGATOR websites were not trustworthy in your opinion, so now you think some liberal newspaper overrides an actual scientific journal.

Show me where I said that.

Unfucking believable.

It does actually say that chloroquine stopped transmission of SARs Coronavirus and pretty much killed it off in the original host, doesn't it?

You go ahead believe USA Today, since that is the most respected bastion of science in the USA.

If you don't like USA Today fact checker there are two others for your reading pleasure.


Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk

Maybe this will help explain why the study is not applicable.

Overstates scientific confidence: The claim that chloroquine is a cure against SARS-CoV-2 is based on an in vitro study published in 2005 on SARS-CoV-1. It is impossible to infer that a drug will work as a COVID-19 cure in a living person from an in vitro cell culture study on a different virus, even one as closely related to SARS-CoV-2 as SARS-CoV-1.
Factually Inaccurate: There is no indication that the 2005 research paper was requested, conducted, or funded by the NIH. Rather, the authors were affiliated with the U.S. CDC and a Canadian research institute.

[EODguy]

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk

[bcredliner]

Originally Posted by EODguy

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk

Can't read all of your post.

[bcredliner]

Originally Posted by EODguy

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk

Suggest you read my response again. The sources had nothing to do with the discussion. I said nothing about aggregators being good or bad.

[ard]

EOD posts a peer reviewed article on HCQ in **cell cultures"""...totally pointless in supporting a claim of clinical efficacy in a population of humans. I mean there are more- fraudulent studies, quacks creating meta analyses of previously withdrawn trials to create unsupported claims. Just hackery



HCQ is a proven scam. If you still believe it in you have two choices: moron or scammer. Pick one.


Rocketman, maybe head back to oann and war room? Ya know, to your people....


Oh, there really is no point at all in engaging with these alt right whackos- they arent playing in reality, just one conspiracy theory after another.


Lizard people....chem trials...Q anon.... Flynn fielding an army of right thinking patriots. Deluded AND dangerous.

[RocketyMan]

Originally Posted by ard

EOD posts a peer reviewed article on HCQ in **cell cultures"""...totally pointless in supporting a claim of clinical efficacy in a population of humans. I mean there are more- fraudulent studies, quacks creating meta analyses of previously withdrawn trials to create unsupported claims. Just hackery



HCQ is a proven scam. If you still believe it in you have two choices: moron or scammer. Pick one.


Rocketman, maybe head back to oann and war room? Ya know, to your people....


Oh, there really is no point at all in engaging with these alt right whackos- they arent playing in reality, just one conspiracy theory after another.


Lizard people....chem trials...Q anon.... Flynn fielding an army of right thinking patriots. Deluded AND dangerous.

Says the guy from "commie"fornia. Just look at how that state is run...where businesses flee the state because of the "left" policies. How's that "eutopia" working out for you? Wake up! Your state is literally covered in shat!
https://www.tecma.com/companies-are-leaving-california/


But that's okay. You're just mad. You are right about one thing--being a patriot. And that is in comparison to your political affiliation wearing "che" shirts and not even having a clue of the history nor implications.

[EODguy]

"EOD posts a peer reviewed article on HCQ in **cell cultures"""...totally pointless in supporting a claim of clinical efficacy in a population of humans. I mean there are more- fraudulent studies, quacks creating meta analyses of previously withdrawn trials to create unsupported claims. Just hackery" ~ard

ARD thinks this study from (2005) is "fake" and part of the studies done about HCQ during the pandemic, even though it was done by the CDC and their Canadian counterparts.

Yeah let's try something that ARD might understand... like righty tighty, lefty loosey.

I'm sure he's not a scientist but he should understand basic scientific findings.

I am also sure that the last time he had a piece of ass, was when his fingers broke through the toilet paper.

Sent from my SM-A730F using Tapatalk