| chilliwilli |
04-08-2009 07:56 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT///MC
BTW, certain cars are set to fail due to the economic climate. No matter how good looking or how great performing they are. Remeber the 840 and 850's of the early 90s? Those cars failed miserably b/c they were launched right at the start of the 1991 recession. Nice. The X6M is 2009's 850CSi. Its not going to sell. Its pretty ugly too btw. Not sure what BMW was thinking on that body style. Not too pretty IMO.
|
If this were true, regardless of how you personally feel about it's looks etc...then the X6 wouldn't have been such a success. BMW already met and exceeded their annual bottom line with the X6. There is intense market analysis and due diligence (as in any business-case), at concept stage. They obviously took the economic climate into consideration.
///M is a premium brand, their target demo are either slightly or not affected by the economic downturn. There are tenfold more affluent, now, than before and during the late 80's & 90's recession. Both X ///M's WILL sell to their niche market. Consider that a consumer in the market for a Pepper Turbo S (~$130K USD), now has an option of an X6 or X5 with better performance and a better price.
I respect your opinion, but I know of several people who are interested in dumping their ML63's and Pepper Turbo's for a TT X5 & X6 ///M. Their status differ, from single or married with a child or no kids. They believe the X6 suits them...They are the demo, obviously not you. Personally, i'm more interested in the X5 ///M...i wasn't the biggest fan of the X6 but it grew on me...throw in 555hp TT, towing capability, and 0-60 in 4.5sec, and i'm a bigger fan of the X6 ///M.
|