Xoutpost.com
Page 19 of 19 « First 9101112131415161718 19
Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page

Xoutpost.com (https://xoutpost.com/forums.php)
-   X5 (E70) Forum (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e70-forum/)
-   -   Any 35D Owners install this performance tune? (https://xoutpost.com/bmw-sav-forums/x5-e70-forum/78647-any-35d-owners-install-performance-tune.html)

JCL 02-24-2011 01:48 AM
:rofl:

Pressure makes diamonds. And wine. As I remind myself sometimes on major projects.

quackbury 02-24-2011 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL (Post 807195)
:rofl:

Pressure makes diamonds. And wine. As I remind myself sometimes on major projects.
If I was the mod on this thread I think I would have been consuming the latter in major quantities. (Maybe that's why you were AWOL for the last couple pages.....)

tonytsai0429 03-30-2013 06:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL (Post 797569)
The OBC is not expected to be accurate with this box installed. It is a documented side-effect of the box fooling the ECU. If you are measuring from tank to tank, and calculating manually, I would be interested in any improved fuel consumption. Unlikely though, as it takes fuel to make power, and if you are noticing more power, you are burning more fuel. If you aren't using any of the increased power, you wouldn't burn more fuel, but then what would be the point of having the tune?
was there any result from tank to tank fuel consumption? :D

JCL 03-30-2013 12:32 PM
You are responding to a two year old thread, and most of the posters on this particular thread came over from other boards to have a debate about one particular tuner. They left en mass after the drama died down.

It is a valid question as to whether actual (real world, not OBC) fuel consumption changed after any particular tune, but it would be better to start a thread with that question, IMO.

Howiedds 03-30-2013 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tonytsai0429 (Post 930012)
was there any result from tank to tank fuel consumption? :D
your right foot determines mpg. if you floor it all the time its gonna result in low mpg.

tonytsai0429 03-30-2013 10:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCL (Post 930052)
You are responding to a two year old thread, and most of the posters on this particular thread came over from other boards to have a debate about one particular tuner. They left en mass after the drama died down.

It is a valid question as to whether actual (real world, not OBC) fuel consumption changed after any particular tune, but it would be better to start a thread with that question, IMO.
JCL...i understand...

I'm justing dying here reading all 10+ thread to find out an answer if this thing has timing advancement...

from little i know, from the Eprom tuning, back in the early 90s, they do claim a fuel efficiency. I will go ahead and start another thread in regards to your suggestions. thanks! :thumbup:

Howiedds,

I get it about the right foot, and right wrist (i own many motorcycles as well) theory, but, in nature, does this mod gives a better fuel efficiency?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.
Page 19 of 19 « First 9101112131415161718 19
Show 200 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin, Copyright 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0
© 2017 Xoutpost.com. All rights reserved.